Problem FOUR: Mike Lee knows this as well as anyone, he was one who said in the beginning of Bami Care that this was a 'TAX BILL' not a Health Care Bill...stupid liar!!!
Posted on 06/25/2017 3:26:12 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
One of the central campaign promises of Republicans since 2010, which has helped them sweep elections nationwide including the White House last year, has been their vow to repeal and replace Obamacare with a customer-centered, free market solution.
Indeed, the promise was likely a significant reason some reluctant voters chose to vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton last year. And once Trump won the White House, he continued to promise a repeal and replace of Obamacare would come in the immediate days of his presidency.
However, the initial effort by House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and the White House to repeal and replace Obamacare failed. That’s because a faction of conservative Republicans didn’t support the bill and said it didn’t go far enough in repealing Obamacare — and the ACA’s stiff regulations — nor did it sufficiently replace Obamacare with a system that Republicans had promised.
After the failure, the White House vowed to move on from health care reform, but all the while congressional Republicans kept working behind the scenes. And finally in May, they narrowly passed a repeal and replace bill. Next, the buck was sent to the Senate and after much secrecy, Senate Republicans also drafted their own version of Obamacare repeal and replace.
However, a problem quickly arose: the Senate’s most conservative members don’t support the bill because they say it doesn’t go far enough to repeal Obamacare nor replace it with a system they promised constituents. Currently, Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Dean Heller (R-Nev.) have announced their opposition to the bill.
And in a new op-ed on Medium penned Friday, Lee explained why he doesn’t support the legislation and what it will take to earn his vote.
Lee began:
No, the Senate healthcare bill released yesterday does not repeal Obamacare. It doesn’t even significantly reform American healthcare.
It cuts taxes. It bails out insurance companies. It props up Obamacare through the next election. It lays out plans to slow Medicaid spending beginning in 2025, but that probably won’t happen. And it leaves in place the ham-fisted federal regulations that have driven up family health insurance premiums by 140 percent since Obamacare was implemented.
Lee explained that because he is open-minded and understands the opportunity is finally available to repeal Obamacare, he has done some major compromising.
First, Lee said he pushed for a full Obamacare repeal, but his Republican colleagues didn’t agree to it, so he then pushed for a partial Obamacare repeal. The partial repeal would "force Congress to start over on a new system that could work better," Lee wrote, and is something Republican leaders promised in January, he noted.
But his Republican colleagues also didn’t want a partial Obamacare repeal, so Lee said he then focused on repealing all of Obamacare’s stiff regulations because they "have been the primary drivers of spiking premiums."
"I repeated this suggestion at every single meeting of the working group, and at every members lunch for several weeks," Lee wrote. "Yet when the Better Care Reconciliation Act was unveiled yesterday, the core Obamacare regulations were largely untouched."
The Senate bill keeps the Democrats’ broken system intact, just with less spending on the poor to pay for corporate bailouts and tax cuts. A cynic might say that the BCRA is less a Republican health care bill than a caricature of a Republican health care bill," he added.
Still, Lee said he is determined to work with his Republican Senate colleagues to come together on a deal.
Noting all of the compromises he and his conservative colleagues have made, Lee said that he will support the bill on only one simple condition: if an "opt-out" provision is added for both individuals and states.
"The only hope for actually solving the deep, challenging problems in our health care system is to let people try out approaches other than the ones a few dozen politicians thought up inside the D.C. bubble," Lee wrote.
"And so, for all my frustrations about the process and my disagreements with the substance of BCRA, I would still be willing to vote for it if it allowed states and/or individuals to opt-out of the Obamacare system free-and-clear to experiment with different forms of insurance, benefits packages, and care provision options," he explained.
"To win my vote, the Republican health care bill must create a little space for states and individuals to sidestep Washington’s arrogant incompetence, and see if they can do better. Recent history suggests Washington couldn’t possibly do worse," Lee concluded.
The original article by Mike Lee here: The Missing Ingredient in BCRA: Humility
Source url here: https://medium.com/@SenMikeLee/the-missing-ingredient-in-bcra-humility-771ce270fd00
No, the Senate healthcare bill released yesterday does not repeal Obamacare. It doesn’t even significantly reform American healthcare.
It cuts taxes. It bails out insurance companies. It props up Obamacare through the next election. It lays out plans to slow Medicaid spending beginning in 2025, but that probably won’t happen. And it leaves in place the ham-fisted federal regulations that have driven up family health insurance premiums by 140 percent since Obamacare was implemented.
As the bill is currently drafted, I won’t vote for it. On the other hand, I understand the opportunity Republicans have right now to help Americans get better, more affordable coverage.
That’s why I joined the Senate working group on healthcare reform with an open mind. I knew then, as I know now, that as one of the most conservative Republican Senators, I would have to compromise with the least conservative Republican Senators to get something done. And compromise I have!
At the beginning of this process, I wanted a full repeal of Obamacare. Despite campaigning on that very thing for eight years, my Republican colleagues disagreed.
So then I called for a partial repeal, like we passed in 2015 — and which conservatives were promised by our leaders in January. A partial repeal would at least force Congress to start over on a new system that could work better.
Again, no.
So then I advocated repealing Obamacare’s regulations, which have been the primary drivers of spiking premiums. I repeated this suggestion at every single meeting of the working group, and at every members lunch for several weeks. Yet when the Better Care Reconciliation Act was unveiled yesterday, the core Obamacare regulations were largely untouched.
Far short of "repeal," the Senate bill keeps the Democrats’ broken system intact, just with less spending on the poor to pay for corporate bailouts and tax cuts. A cynic might say that the BCRA is less a Republican health care bill than a caricature of a Republican health care bill.
Yet, for all that, I have not closed the door on voting for some version of it in the end. Conservatives have compromised on not repealing, on spending levels, tax credits, subsidies, corporate bailouts, Medicaid, and the Obamacare regulations. That is, on every substantive question in the bill.
Having conceded to my moderate colleagues on all of the above, I now ask only that the bill be amended to include an opt-out provision, for states or even just for individuals.
The reason Americans are divided about health care (like so many issues today) is that we don’t know exactly how to fix it. Politicians hate to admit it, and partisans like to pretend otherwise. But it’s true. And history teaches us that when we don’t know how to solve a problem, the best thing to do is to experiment. We should test different ideas through a cooperative, bottom-up, trial-and-error process rather than imposing top-down, partisan power-plays that disrupt the lives of hundreds of millions of people at a time.
Eight years ago Democrats created a one-size-fits-all national health care system… and it’s collapsing around us. They couldn’t even make the darn website work! Why do Republicans — who are supposedly skeptical of government miracle-working — expect our one-size-fits-all scheme to work any better?
The only hope for actually solving the deep, challenging problems in our health care system is to let people try out approaches other than the ones a few dozen politicians thought up inside the D.C. bubble.
And so, for all my frustrations about the process and my disagreements with the substance of BCRA, I would still be willing to vote for it if it allowed states and/or individuals to opt-out of the Obamacare system free-and-clear to experiment with different forms of insurance, benefits packages, and care provision options. Liberal states might try single-payer systems, while conservatives might emphasize health savings accounts. Some people embrace association health plans or so-called “medishare” ministry models. My guess is different approaches will work for different people in different places — like everything else in life.
The only way to find out what does work is to find out what doesn’t. We know the pre-Obamacare system was breaking down. Now we know Obamacare is failing too. I doubt the BCRA system would fare much better, or that the next Pelosi-Sanders-Warren scheme Democrats cook up wouldn’t be even worse.
At some point Washington elites might at least entertain the possibility that we may not have all the answers. I think right now — with President Trump’s shocking upset of the establishment still fresh in our minds — would be a good time for Congress to add a new ingredient to its legislative sausage: a dash of humility.
To win my vote, the Republican health care bill must create a little space for states and individuals to sidestep Washington’s arrogant incompetence, and see if they can do better. Recent history suggests Washington couldn’t possibly do worse.
As stated by MIchaelTArchangel on another thread:
This Congress needs three health care financing bills.
Bill 1 would repeal ObamaCare in its entirety.
Bill 2 would state that the Congress has no Constitutional authority to be in the health care business.
Bill 3 would state that Congress does have the Constitutional authority to regulate interstate commerce and will allow insurance companies to engage in interstate commerce.
We didn't vote for Obamacare light. Call your congress critters and tell them what you're thinking. There's now a push to get this done by July 4.
Start over by just repealing Obamacare. Step one.
Related thread: Four Republican senators say they cannot support healthcare bill
The goal of the communists: Socialized medicine and gun control. The BRCA is Obamacare Light, designed to fail to they can eventually 'give up' and pass single payer.
We say no!
RINO’s are committed to polishing the Obamacare turd which is what the democrats are demanding.
Problem FOUR: Mike Lee knows this as well as anyone, he was one who said in the beginning of Bami Care that this was a 'TAX BILL' not a Health Care Bill...stupid liar!!!
I seem to remember being promised that ObamaCare would be repealed. That bill is already written and has been seen in both houses. Any replacement will take time and only validate the Democrat’s requirement for Gov’t involvement in all things for all people. . Vote the repeal now.
> As stated by MIchaelTArchangel on another thread:
I agree with MichaelTArchangel! Do it!
Step one: Vote to repeal Obamacare effective January 1st.
Step two: Start over. And rewrite a plan that’s good for the citizens and doctors...but not the so good for Big Pharm, Big govt or the ambulance chasing lawyers.
Mike Lee should pen a plan if he doesn’t like that one. I’m sick of absolutist critics who never offer solutions.
The Republican party is trash.
I don’t know what it will take for people to accept the truth. Mississippi wasn’t enough? This bill isn’t enough?
They’re T-R-A-S-H.
Will someone please tell this octogenarian exactly why they cannot just repeal the AFA in its entirety? It seems to me that everything would then return to what it was before Obama. Then they could make the necessary (if any) tweaks.
140%? AHHAHAHAHAH. Let’s start with the first day raise - my insurance went from $275 per month to $420 per month, my wife’s went from $172 per month to $370 per month. Our deductible went from $2,000 per policy to $5,000 per policy (or $10,000 per family) + the lovely donut hole liability of another $2,700. Meaning if we had any significant need for the insurance, such as being in an accident, for more than double than what we were paying, we have an additional $8,700 in liability.
Yet supposedly during the course of Obamacare rates only went up 140%?
(By the way, same policy, today, is $680 per month for myself, and $540 per month for my wife with $12,700 in deductibles.) That’s a 300% raise in costs, which isn’t even a fair comparison due to the massively higher deductible cost. Contemplate spending more per month in health insurance cost than you pay per month for your home - senator, I’m glad you got your eyes on the prize and you’re focused on repealing the monstrosity, but stop underselling how massive a cost increase occurred.
The Republican scheme relies upon actions by a future Congress.
If they wanted they could repeal ACA with a simple majority. The problem is they don’t want to.
I don’t think it’s that easy....bureaucracies have been put in place in past 8 years that prevent just a “repeal.”
Agree.
The Senate and House have had 7 years. 7 YEARs to come up with
a plan. Where is Lee’s plan?
I hope DJT stands to the side and lets this squabble play out. If it fails, let Lee and the other powered wigs be responsible for the GOP barnfire in Nov. 2018.
I just don't get why they can't start with repeal. I've read a few explanations as to why they can't, but I think it's mainly political.
I agree. Lee and Cruz should write, and I mean they write it, not Obama carryover staffers. . write their own plan with all the salient points we've talked about, insurance across state lines, HSAs, etc.
Mike Lee...same Mike Lee who tried DESPERATELY to pull stupid tricks, for the nomination, at the RNC Convention??? That Mike Lee??
Writing on The Blaze...owned by Never Trumper, complete loon, Beck???? That Blaze????
Not just no, but HECK no.
They passed repeal during the Obama tenure knowing he would veto it. Why don't they do it now? I'm with you, I just don't get it. They can repeal it and no matter what anyone screams about, people will get care while the other plan, a more conservative plan, is passed.
I also don't like this rush aspect - 'the pass it by July 4th' pressure. After seven years, they didn't have a conservative bill ready to pass, after repeal, right out of the gate. It's all so corrupt.
The reality is there are so many Obama holdovers plus D.C. voted 97% for Hillary. So all the Obama people plus long term dems are writing these bills.
Your example is exactly why we have to have HSAs and insurance across state lines in any bill that's proposed.
Thank you, Art, for posting this. Mike Lee is 100% correct and I applaud him for being among the handful of Republican senators who oppose the ObummerCare Lite bill that, if enacted, will forever be called TrumpCare. I would not want my name attached to this turkey of a bill.
Stay strong, Lee, Cruz, Paul, and Johnson. Repeal, enable across state lines sales of insurance, and then leave it to the states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.