Posted on 06/20/2017 9:12:07 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell
Anger Privilege Only leftists are allowed to be angry. June 20, 2017 Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.
If you want to know who has privilege in a society and who doesnt, follow the anger.
There are people in this country who can safely express their anger. And those who cant. If youre angry that Trump won, your anger is socially acceptable. If you were angry that Obama won, it wasnt.
James Hodgkinsons rage was socially acceptable. It continued to be socially acceptable until he crossed the line into murder. And hes not alone. Theres Micah Xavier Johnson, the Black Lives Matter cop-killer in Dallas, and Gavin Long, the Black Lives Matter cop-killer in Baton Rouge. If youre black and angry about the police, your anger is celebrated. If youre white and angry about the Terror travel ban, the Paris Climate treaty, ObamaCare repeal or any leftist cause, youre on the side of the angry angels.
But if youre white and angry that your job is going to China or that you just missed being killed in a Muslim suicide bombing, your anger is unacceptable.
If youre an angry leftist, your party leader, Tom Perez will scream and curse into a microphone, and your aspiring presidential candidate, Kirsten Gillibrand, will curse along, to channel the anger of the base. But if youre an angry conservative, then Trump channeling your anger is dangerous because you arent allowed to be angry.
Not all anger is created equal. Some anger is privileged rage.
Good anger gets you a gig as a CNN commentator. Bad anger gets you hounded out of your job. Good anger isnt described as anger at all. Instead its linguistically whitewashed as passionate or courageous. Bad anger however is worrying or dangerous. Angry left-wing protesters call out, angry right-wing protesters threaten. Good anger is left-wing. Bad anger is right-wing.
Socially acceptable displays of anger, from Occupy Wall Street to Black Lives Matter riots to the anti-Trump marches to the furious campus protests, are invariably left-wing.
Left-wing anger over the elections of Bush and Trump was sanctified. Right-wing outrage over Obamas victory was demonized. Now that left-wing anger led a Bernie Sanders volunteer to open fire at a Republican charity baseball practice outing. And the media reluctantly concedes that maybe both sides should moderate their rhetoric. Before listing examples that lean to the right like Lock her up.
Why were chants of Lock her up immoderate, but not Bush era cries of Jail to the chief? Why were Tea Party rallies ominous but the latest We Hate Trump march is courageous? Why is killing Trump on stage the hottest thing to hit Shakespeare while a rodeo clown who wore an Obama mask was hounded by everyone from the Lieutenant Governor of Missouri to the NAACP?
Not all anger is created equal. Anger, like everything else, is ideologically coded. Left-wing anger is good because its ideological foundations are good. Right-wing anger is bad because its ideology is bad.
Its not the level of anger, its intensity or its threatening nature that makes it good or bad.
And that is why the left so easily slips into violence. All its ideological ends are good. Therefore its means, from mass starvation to gulags to riots and tyranny, must be good. If I slash your tires because of your Obama bumper sticker, Im a monster. But if you key my car because of my Trump bumper sticker, youre fighting racism and fascism. Your tactics might be in error, but your viewpoint isnt.
There are no universal standards of behavior. Civility, like everything else, is ideologically limited.
Intersectionality frowns on expecting civil behavior from oppressed protesters. Asking that shrieking campus crybully not to scream threats in your face is tone policing. An African-American millionaires child at Yale is fighting for her existence, unlike the Pennsylvania coal miner, the Baltimore police officer and the Christian florist whose existences really are threatened.
Tone policing is how the anger of privileged leftists is protected while the frustration of their victims is suppressed. The existence of tone policing as a specific term to protect displays of left-wing anger shows the collapse of civility into anger privilege. Civility has been replaced by a political entitlement to anger.
The left prides itself on an unearned moral superiority (When they go low, we go high) reinforced by its own echo chamber even as it has become incapable of controlling its angry outbursts. The national tantrum after Trumps victory has all but shut down the government, turned every media outlet into a non-stop feed of conspiracy theories and set off protests that quickly escalated into street violence.
But Trump Derangement Syndrome is a symptom of a problem with the left that existed before he was born. The left is an angry movement. It is animated by an outraged self-righteousness whose moral superiority doubles as dehumanization. And its machinery of culture glamorizes its anger. The media dresses up the seething rage so that the left never has to look at its inner Hodgkinson in the mirror.
The left is as angry as ever. Campus riots and assassinations of Republican politicians are nothing new. What is changing is that its opponents are beginning to match its anger. The left still clings to the same anger it had when it was a theoretical movement with plans, but little impact on the country. The outrage at the left is no longer ideological. There are millions of people whose health care was destroyed by ObamaCare, whose First Amendment rights were taken away, whose land was seized, whose children were turned against them and whose livelihoods were destroyed.
The angry left has gained a great deal of power. It has used that power to wreck lives. It is feverishly plotting to deprive nearly 63 million Americans of their vote by using its entrenched power in the government, the media and the non-profit sector. And it is too blinded by its own anger over the results of the election to realize the anger over its wholesale abuses of power and privileged tantrums.
But monopolies on anger only work in totalitarian states. In a free society, both sides are expected to control their anger and find terms on which to debate and settle issues. The left rejects civility and refuses to control its anger. The only settlement it will accept is absolute power. If an election doesnt go its way, it will overturn the results. If someone offends it, he must be punished. Or there will be anger.
The angry left demands that everyone recognize the absolute righteousness of its anger as the basis for its power. This anger privilege, like tone policing, is often cast in terms of oppressed groups. But its anger isnt in defiance of oppression, but in pursuit of oppression.
Anger privilege is used to silence opposition, to enforce illegal policies and to seize power. But the lefts monopolies on anger are cultural, not political. The entertainment industry and the media can enforce anger privilege norms through public shaming, but their smears cant stop the consequences of the collapse of civility in public life. There are no monopolies on emotion.
When anger becomes the basis for political power, then it wont stop with Howard Dean or Bernie Sanders. Thats what the left found out in the last election. Its phony pearl clutching was a reaction to the consequences of its destruction of civility. Its reaction to that show of anger by conservatives and independents was to escalate the conflict. Instead of being the opposition, the left became the resistance. Trump was simultaneously Hitler and a traitor. Republicans were evil beasts.
James Hodgkinson absorbed all this. The left fed his anger. And eventually he snapped.
Anger has to go somewhere.
The left likes to think that its anger is good anger because its angry over the plight of illegal aliens, Muslim terrorists, transgender bathrooms, the lack of abortion in South Carolina, the minimum wage at Taco Bell, budget cuts, tax cuts, police arrests, drone strikes and all the other ways in which reality differs from its utopia. But all that anger isnt the road to a better world, but to hate and violence.
Millions of leftists, just like Hodgkinson, are told every day that Republicans are responsible for everything wrong with their lives, the country and the planet. Despite everything they do, all the petitions they sign, the marches they attend, the donations, the angry letters, the social media rants, Republicans continue to exist and even be elected to public office. Where does that anger go?
Either we have a political system based on existing laws and norms of civility. Or we have one based on coups and populist leftist anger. And there are already a whole bunch of those south of the border.
Leftist anger is a privileged bubble of entitlement that bursts every other election. Its choice is to try to understand the rest of the country or to intimidate, censor, oppress and eventually kill them.
James Hodgkinson took the latter course. His personal leftist revolution ended, as all leftist revolutions do, in blood and violence. The left can check its anger privilege and examine its entitlement.
Or his violence will be our future.
Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center
Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.
I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.
I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.
FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought.
Lou
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post.
Greenfield brilliance at its best. There will be more and more violence until te violence of the left is shut down. Lincoln took us into war with our brothers. Trump is seeking ways to avoid that same bloodshed. Leftists prefer blood to compromise.
Please include matthew fuller. Thanks.
Their is a quiet a smoldering anger on the right. As law abiding citizens this anger does not lead to violence. If the civil order of law ever breaks down this smoldering anger will no longer be restrained by law as the law has ceased to exist.
If this sad day ever comes to pass, all hell will break loose.
We are angry! We do not want this to happen but we will not go quietly in the night like the Jews in Europe under Hitler.
The insane left wing views conservatives the exact same way Hitler viewed the Jews.
Molon Labe
300 yards is easy.
Wow!!
GREAT ARTICLE.
Thanks for posting.
600 is quite doable.
Very good read. Some very dreadful implications in this article. Too bad very few leftists will read or get the message.
Very good article. He always seems to hit the nail right on the head. The rhetoric of the leftists really sets me on edge,but instead of resorting to name calling & possible violence,I just have to walk away....wondering how anyone can be so ignorant of the real facts in the matter.
Great article. Bump.
Great article. Thanks for posting.
He has a perfectly cogent explanation of what is wrong. The problem is that we can’t do anything about the people who see the world through their anger and see ours as inappropriate. Being reasonable against an unreasonable opponent just doesn’t work. The only thing I can think to do is try to re-legislate civility. But Canada does it against one side only. Where are the golden mean people who can fairly arbitrate civility? Probably nowhere. So I’m totally blocked on what we can do to bring civility to the other side.
Bringing civility to the uncivilized must be done with a strong hand. Bone up on parenting skills. Treating the uncivilized as children in need of discipline breaks the rebellious spirit. This is precisely Trump’s tactic. He tone polices.
Incivility will only persist if it is successful. Remove the rewards and create punishments and the behavior will diminish.
I am of the opinion that most all, if not every LIEberal, has NEVER had to take responsibility for their words or actions.
IOW, they have never been knocked on their ass for saying or doing the hateful/unlawful things they say and do.
Given the LIEberal escalation of the intensity level lately, that MAY be about to change!
Robert Heinlein once said, “An armed society is a polite society.”
It is up to us to decide if we’ll take their uncivil, rude anger or not. If it leads to violence from their side (it has), we need to answer with stronger violence.
I only care about the Left if the wish to do me harm. However, if they wish to, but are too afraid of me to try it, then that’s perfect.
That is right where I want the Left to be.
Otherwise, I don’t give a rat’s ass about their anger anymore than I care about a stepped on fire ant mound (so long as it’s not me stepping in it!).
Interesting. I don’t have children and was dreadful as a student teacher because the only tool I had to deal with children was reason and it just didn’t work. That leaves me at a severe disability when it comes to dealing with democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.