Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sensible Maddow Control
MSNBC | 6/15/2017

Posted on 06/15/2017 7:22:53 AM PDT by grayhog

Which congressman will introduce a bill to stop the violence by requiring background checks and psychological screening before people are authorized to watch MSNBC's Rachel Maddow? We don't want to take away your 1st Amendment rights, but just allow for sensible regulation. If we can save one more life by screening out the potential crazies, isn't it worth it? How much 'media violence' could be stopped by sensible regulation? Rep Scalise should be starting a super PAC called Americans for Responsible Media Solutions (ARMS) to advocate for left wing media control. We can make American communities safer while still protecting 1st Amendment rights.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: maddow; scalise
If this sounds similar to Gabby Giffords gun control super PAC, that is purely a coincidence.
1 posted on 06/15/2017 7:22:53 AM PDT by grayhog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grayhog

We need to close the Fake News “Loop Hole”


2 posted on 06/15/2017 7:27:22 AM PDT by Princeton Drive Irregulars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

If you disagree with a liberal, it’s called ‘Hate Speech’.
If a liberal disagrees with you, it’s called ‘Free Speech’.

Got it?....................


3 posted on 06/15/2017 7:29:32 AM PDT by Red Badger (Unless you eat The Bread of Life, you are toast!.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

I wish she would just choke and a vagina


4 posted on 06/15/2017 7:40:07 AM PDT by al baby (May the Forceps be with you Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

Perhaps a five days waiting period in-between watching episodes of Rachel
Madcow.

If it saves one life it’s worth it.


5 posted on 06/15/2017 7:40:13 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

MadCow needs to be tamed.


6 posted on 06/15/2017 7:41:02 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog
“We don't want to take away your 1st Amendment rights, but just allow for sensible regulation.”

In other words, “common sense controls” for liberals. Where have we heard that?

7 posted on 06/15/2017 7:44:14 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

Mandatory background checks before you’re allowed to watch Rachel Maddow.


8 posted on 06/15/2017 7:50:33 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

Certainly if we can restrict the 2nd amendment, there should be no problem with sensible restrictions on the 1st amendment.

Her viewers need to be fingerprinted, take a class on fake news and have a background check.


9 posted on 06/15/2017 8:01:55 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

The Arlington YMCA needs to be vetting its clients.


10 posted on 06/15/2017 8:15:28 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog
How many of these dangerous military-style assault liberals on TV do we really need? Isn't one enough?
11 posted on 06/15/2017 8:18:45 AM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

12 posted on 06/15/2017 8:27:49 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

Cable and Satellite TV Channel control for the masses... CRTV for everyone with basic or better service packages. Any other news channels, requires vetting.


13 posted on 06/15/2017 8:34:30 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

Would rather tie their voting ‘rights’ to the same 2nd A. laws on the books....Let’s see their heads explode and activist judges twist THAT logic.


14 posted on 06/15/2017 9:03:30 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayhog

That was awesome!!!


15 posted on 06/15/2017 10:49:48 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson