Posted on 05/26/2017 4:02:37 AM PDT by davikkm
Fine with me. How do we get underway?
duh
You don't say....
Democrats are Communist Dirtbags.
If you find that appealing, then join the other side.
Just ask Seth Rich and John Podesta.
Oops, you said to “yell that past you”, well then.
DEMOCRATS are COMMUNIST DIRTBAGS!!
Did you hear it that time?
I love these guys who suddenly see civil war looming. I saw it decades ago and began predicting it, to others, in conversation in 1995. I was calling it all going down in about 20 years. As political predictions go that’s calling it dead on.
As one who has studied the Civil War, that statement shows an utter lack of historical knowledge. The 24 hr news cycle has just amped up the volume which has now been pushed to distortion levels in a pathetic attempt by the MSM to hold market share and push an agenda.
We're done, I'll never see him again.
This time the south would win......
We now have the manufacturing, communications and supply routes....Our infrastructure is distributed as well as our populace.....
We are better armed and trained.....
The Starbuck swilling, tofu eating, gluten free, Northeast liberals would last two days.......
Never would I advocate a civil war, nor would the other freedom loving hard working Americans in the South. but if the NE liberals try to take over the government and subvert the Constitution.......Game on!
John Quincy Adams and John Calhoun “called it” about thirty five years ahead of time of the first civil war—neither wanted to see it happen, both wanted to figure out a compromise that could work, but both agreed there were major differences that could not be resolved.
Does the author think New England and the Deep South used to be in any way similar? Not in my lifetime. 50 years ago Boston was liberal and the South was seen as a backwater with slow thick accents northerners couldn’t understand. And they hated Yankees.
BUMP!
If one gets out of the cities, there are more similarities between the South and New England than the author would have you believe. The differences are more between the big city-big government crowd and those who want government the hell out of their lives.
This is a perfect example of bias. The right is "fighting back in self defense", making the demonstrations turn "more and more violent", but the left is "responding" by "increasing its level of force".
The left is not "responding", they are escalating. The order of presentation and the words use deliberately make it seem the right is the cause of the violence, because they refuse to be punching bags any more.
If the article did not mean to convey this impression, the writer needs to seriously consider relearning English.
It’s really up to our side. If we insist on LAW AND ORDER, the agitators will be jailed, the Illegals will be sent home, voting will be secure, and our side will remain the majority, while treating the non-violent opposition with respect.
If we try to compromise with the left, it will be civil war. Just here in Texas, considering the makeup of our highest levels of government here - if Hillary had won, we would have quickly reached a point of telling DC to shove it...and depending on Hillary’s reaction (send in the Guard, maybe the military), we would have been looking at combat.
Thankfully that didn’t happen...but we’re still not in the clear, not even close. And the biggest thing our side can do to prevent a civil war is to STICK TOGETHER, even if it means having the media mad at us and hurt feelings (are you listening Senator Cruz?).
Must be something in the water in that area. My friend of fifty-plus years lives next door in Arroyo Grande. We’re not at the ‘finished’ stage yet, but close.
With good reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.