Posted on 04/07/2017 11:15:44 AM PDT by jfd1776
What do we know about the modern Middle East, particularly the “hot zones” like Syria, the Gaza Strip, and Iraq?
We know that people die before their time. Old people, young people, children, even babies. Innocent or guilty, they’re all targets of the Islamic jihadists’ war for the control of their regions, and ultimately, the world.
In Syria, for example, where we have been horrified at the murders of little children by an apparent chemical weapon attack allegedly committed at the order of Bashir al-Assad, we must remember how other children were killed the very same week, even the very same day, in separate incidents just miles away.
What happens to all the other children who were NOT killed by that chemical weapon attack? Well, they’re likely to be either:
1) killed by that same side in a different incident tomorrow or next week, or
2) killed by another side in a different incident tomorrow or next week, or
3) strapped into a suicide vest and sent out by their own parents to blow up a military base, or a mall, or a tour bus, or a restaurant tomorrow or next week, or
4) sent to Europe or the United States or some other country as a sleeper cell for jihad, to be activated later, perhaps years later, when he or she grows up.
This is what will happen to many of them; in some communities, even most of them.
This is reality. It's a horrible, hellish, evil reality, but it IS reality.
And what we in the United States must remember is that it is not our fault.
It's the fault of a bunch of caliphs, 1400 years ago, who set their culture on this evil path. And it’s the fault of a bunch of imams and mullahs and other so-called “clerics” today, who spread jihad by teaching it in mosques and islamic community centers, and online on free webshows, and in books, and even in American prisons where we allow them to ply their evil trade as “chaplains.”
Not all islamic clerics or practitioners support these evils, of course; we all know good, decent people who happen to have been raised Muslim.
But the fact remains that only in islam – in opposition to all the major world religions – do preachers call for such evils as terrorism, suicide bombings, hostage taking, and the mass execution of innocents – and pass it off as a critical doctrine of their religion. Christian and Jewish communities establish schools where we teach our children to read and write and do math; only islamic communities establish madrassahs where they teach their children to murder innocent strangers, and pass off such compounds as “schools.”
We in the West didn't do this. We can't be blamed for it, and there's nothing we can do about it.
But… if you want to know who CAN do something about it…
It’s those mullahs and imams of Islam. Yes, the ones who run those madrassahs, the ones who lead the mosques and ICCs. The ones online as “teachers” of their adherents. They could stage a reformation within islam to remove the barbarity from it, and formalize the decent moderation practiced by the decent muslim individuals whom we all know. These “clerics” could end the institutionalization of sharia law. They could redefine islam as a true religion, as it claims to be, instead of the cult of death that it is today in so much of the world.
But… do you remember what happened when General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi called for such a reformation, before a roomful of prominent islamic clerics, on January 1, 2015?
Egypt’s General al-Sisi sounded the call, and looked his audience in the eye. And they looked back at him.
And all we heard were crickets. A roomful of crickets.
Today, American airstrikes in Syria may indicate a change in our foreign policy. But foreign policy can sometimes be a minefield, full of wrong choices, with no right choice to be had but staying out.
Wanting to help in Syria is understandable. WISHING to help is honorable. But when there are no heroes to support - only a choice of various evils, the true path of wisdom is to stay out. In a world of 200 separate sovereign nations, wisdom requires recognizing that some of them simply have no US interest, and perhaps even no possible good end to strive for.
Tragically, today’s Syria is such a place. It has many factions, and no faction with any chance of taking power would be an improvement over the hell currently in place there.
Patriotic Americans have complained for a century that our government lights our tax dollars on fire and burns them up in Washington DC for no good end. Well, blowing up our tax dollars overseas in million dollar bundles called “Tomahawks” – for no good end – is no improvement.
Copyright 2017 John F. Di Leo
John F. Di Leo is a Chicagoland-based writer, trade compliance lecturer, and actor. His columns are frequently found in Illinois Review
Permission is hereby granted to forward freely, provided it is uncut and the IR URL and byline are included.
blowing up our tax dollars overseas in million dollar bundles called “Tomahawks” – for no good end – is no improvement.....
####ing BRAVO.
Just think of it as a $250 million dollar warning to all countries that using chemical weapons will get your butt kicked. Oh and by the way, The U.S. has an American president now, not some Kenyan who bluffs about red lines.
Besides I think the costs for missles are usually overstated and not replacement costs. I think they may even include one-time development costs, and stuff like ship operating costs and man power that we were going to pay anyway.
I don’t have a problem with the air strike itself, because it was the only way to explain to Putin that he should exert a reasonable level of control on his ally. Trump essentially told Russia that Assad can kill all the citizens he desires, but just don’t use chemical weapons. In terms of a deeper involvement, I have problem because then our troops would have to shoot four ways at the same time with everyone arrayed against them.
Russia under Putin is pursuing a course Stalin, Khrushchev, or Brezhnev of the old Soviet Union would never have approved. Their allies always received prior generation technology; whether it be tanks, missiles, cryptography, etc. They would never have helped Iran, with whom they share a border, to develop an atomic bomb or given them an air defense system they could not easily defeat. For an ally/agent like Syria, they would have authorized armed forces use only to the extent it was well within traditional actions, which the Soviet Union would be able to manage politically.
If it DIES here, ok.
But now the US military is looking into a Russian connection to the chemical attacks.
What do we do then?
And 20 planes is a lot. There will be more violence to follow, I fear.
We didn’t knock out a bazooka :)
I HOPE we’re not even talking about this in a few days.
Ya gotta admit though, we didn’t mind when saddam used them on Iran :)
If evidence of a Russian connection is found, then we either use it publicly to shame Russia. Or we use it privately to insist Russia make Assad step down.
There is some logic that says if you keep your enemies fighting each other, they are too busy to fight you.
The moral high road is that you try to bring peace to all.
I noticed Israel warned back at the start of ISIS, not to arm either side. That introducing more arms into the region was a mistake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.