Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Josh Waldron, CEO of SilencerCo on the Suppressor Export Act
Gun Watch ^ | 24 February, 2017 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 03/04/2017 5:43:15 AM PST by marktwain


Suppressors are currently under the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). That means suppressors may not be sold to individuals overseas, only to approved governments. Suppressors are not extraordinary high technology. Sophisticated suppressors are not secrets. They can be produced by any concern with modern machinery.

The current restrictions were put in place by a memorandum from the Department of State in 2002, a few months after the attack on 9/11.  While U.S. manufacturers are forbidden to sell to individuals overseas, foreign manufacturers are not.  A bill was introduced in the House of representatives in 2016 to rectify this situation.  It is called the Suppressor Export Act.

Josh Waldron of SilencerCo explained some of the details of the current situation.

Do you think the Suppressor Export Act will go through in the first year?

"The interesting thing about the Suppressor  Export  Act is that we have the ability to change that in several ways.  I was appointed to President Trump's Second Amendment Coalition.  Once the new administration is settled,  If I can use my relationships to convince the State Department to get rid of the policy memo that forbid the export of suppressors, we do not need legislation.

There never was a regulation change, there never was a comment period, there was never legislation, that made it that we could not export suppressors. There was a guy who sent out a memo saying "we are no longer going to approve of the export of suppressors."

We are working it from all angles. Moving into Commerce takes it out of DDTC. That would be extremely helpful.   There is a three pronged approach, legislation, export reform, a relationship to convince the administration to tear up the memo."

 
One man in the Department of State stopped all commercial exports of suppressors with one memo.

The memo explains why I did not notice any American "sound moderators" in a recent article about .22 sound moderators in an English shooting publication.

President Trump has often talked about unfair trade deals. This sounds like a self imposed trade limit that could be reversed rather easily.  It appears to be a problem that could be solved by another memo from the State Department.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; export; silencers; state
A memo written in the State Department in 2002 stopped export of suppressors/silencer to any but foreign governments.

No law, no regulation, not due process. Deep state stuff.

1 posted on 03/04/2017 5:43:15 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Power-drunk government punks... Bad!


2 posted on 03/04/2017 6:06:10 AM PST by W. (Deny the infiltrating lazy scum who only want a free ride admission to the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Well, it’s a double-edged sword - suppressors should be legal, and if they are legalized, the ones going for $350 now (before the cost of the stamp) will be coming from China at $19 a piece, retail.


3 posted on 03/04/2017 6:17:35 AM PST by Fido969 (IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

” I have a pen and I have a phone”

Ridiculous.


4 posted on 03/04/2017 6:32:50 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Trump has a pen and a phone too.


5 posted on 03/04/2017 6:34:53 AM PST by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It should be:

“Ace is the place fwith the super helpful suppressor man.”

There should be zero paperwork.


6 posted on 03/04/2017 6:43:22 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Well, it was during the Dubya Bush administration, only a few months after 9/11.


7 posted on 03/04/2017 6:44:10 AM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Well, it’s a double-edged sword - suppressors should be legal, and if they are legalized, the ones going for $350 now (before the cost of the stamp) will be coming from China at $19 a piece, retail.
___________________________________________________

If that were true, why aren’t we buying Chinese shotguns for $19? American Shotguns (the 870) runs about $329, retail.

The Chinese copy runs about $210.


8 posted on 03/04/2017 6:49:13 AM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Ping


9 posted on 03/04/2017 6:51:45 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt (Muslim & Spanish migrants are like Kudzu--> designed to overload the system= Cloward-Piven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; ...

RKBA Ping List

This list is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.

If you would like to be added to or deleted from this Ping List, please FReepmail me.

10 posted on 03/04/2017 7:22:04 AM PST by PROCON (Defending the Border isn't a Political Option, it's a Constitutional Obligation ~ Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
If that were true, why aren’t we buying Chinese shotguns for $19? American Shotguns (the 870) runs about $329, retail.

The Chinese copy runs about $210

Shotgun has moving parts, which a suppressor does not. Receiver for shotgun must be strengthened with tempering. Shotgun must go through FFL, which will mark everything up as much as they can. Shotgun has liability issues.

You can make a suppressor with about $2 worth of materials.

11 posted on 03/04/2017 10:49:03 AM PST by Fido969 (IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

In unregulated markets, I see cheap .22 suppressors going for about $20-$40.

For high powered rifle suppressors, about $300 to $600.

That is in New Zealand, where anyone can buy one or a dozen, cash and carry.

So, there is a range of prices.


12 posted on 03/04/2017 11:07:54 AM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The current restrictions were put in place by a memorandum from the Department of State in 2002, a few months after the attack on 9/11.

I thought I knew the general details of 9/11 pretty well.

Someone please enlighten me.

What did suppressors have to do with 9/11?

13 posted on 03/04/2017 1:19:12 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson