Posted on 02/23/2017 9:47:54 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
Every day the forcing out of Mike Flynn looks more and more like a well-coordinated political hit job
Video and transcripts have surfaced of President Trump’s brand new national security advisor, H.R. McMaster, making the preposterous claim that the Islamic State is not actually Islamic.
This is the same outrageous lie peddled by former President Obama and his Botox-addicted second secretary of state, John Kerry, who twisted themselves into pretzels almost daily to avoid creating adverse publicity for The Official Religion of Peace.
Maybe it’s the idea that it is NOT a religion...it’s a muzzie army.
Maybe white-washing the connection to Islam has something to do with this plan they’re discussing to get the Saudi armed forces involved in Syria, purportedly to battle ISIS. (Which is sort of a joke - if the Saudis are hard-pressed to battle the rag-tag Houtis, how can they fight ISIS?)
I do have doubts about this guy. Pretty much all of the Rats praised him. He told his troops not to make any disparaging remarks about the captured terrorists. What the hell is that ? These guys my have just blown one or more brothers to pieces and your CO tells you not to say anything bad about them.
If Trump keeps hiring Obama generals it is only a matter of time until he rolls snake eyes. I hope this isn’t the one.
Anybody actually read the quote? Seems like the author of this site is pushing clickbait.
“We are engaged today, as General George C. Marshall’s generation was engaged, against enemies who pose a great threat to all civilized peoples. As our World War II generation defeated Nazi Fascism and Japanese imperialism, and as later generations defeated Communist totalitarianism, we will defeat today’s enemies, including terrorist organizations like Daesh, who cynically use a perverted interpretation of religion to incite hatred and justify horrific cruelty against innocents.”
I disagree with McMasters if that is what he said but in the end, those are words.
Does he have a real plan to fight ISIS, eliminate it? That is what is important in the end. (Fighting meant on a realistic level and not to get involved in neo-Con ventures, something constructive)
Good post.
There’s nothing wrong with the actual quote. What follows from it logically is that the Muslim faithful have to renounce ISIS.
Daesh, who cynically use a perverted interpretation of religion to incite hatred and justify horrific cruelty against innocents.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That perverted interpretation is Mohammed’s own.
Islam is evil at its core.
It wouldn’t surprise me.
“Maybe white-washing the connection to Islam has something to do with this plan they’re discussing to get the Saudi armed forces involved in Syria, purportedly to battle ISIS. (Which is sort of a joke - if the Saudis are hard-pressed to battle the rag-tag Houtis, how can they fight ISIS?)”
I hope this isn’t true as the Saudi army never does any fighting. They have to pay Morocco and Senegal to send soldiers over for them to use. In the 70s when terrorists took over religious sites in Mecca their own troops refused to fight to take it back and so they made a secret deal with the UK for SAS to take them back. Any reliance on Saudis is a mistake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.