Posted on 02/22/2017 5:36:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Connecticut’s Democratic governor, Dannel Malloy, told local police and law enforcement that they basically don’t have to abide by federal requests to detain undocumented immigrants. On top of that, he pretty much encouraged them not to cooperate with federal agents all together.
“ICE detainer requests are requests, they are not warrants or orders and this should only be honored as set forth in Connecticut law, unless accompanied by a judicial warrant,” Malloy said in a letter sent to local law enforcement on Wednesday.
Malloy’s letter was sent a day after the Trump administration issued sweeping guidelines that targeted millions of immigrants. Trump’s policy prioritizes immigrants nationwide who have been accused or convicted of a crime, but could theoretically include many more including those arrested for something simple like traffic violations.
Malloy’s letter tells local law enforcement that they should not give ICE agents access to people in local custody for questioning, and should refer any such requests up to command. While the letter contends police should not “impede federal immigration activity,” Connecticut sure doesn’t want to make it easy for the feds to enforce Trump’s executive order. The letter notes that under federal law, local agents are not required to enforce immigration law, and they are encouraged not to help ICE whatsoever.
“Acting as an arm of ICE may undermine Connecticut’s many efforts to incorporate the principles of community policy in the Police Officers Stands and Training Council’s policies and practices, policies and practices designed to strengthen police and community relations,” the letter reads. It also encourages police not to collect information about a person’s immigration status.
In addition to a letter to local law enforcement, the Connecticut governor also sent a letter to local school districts advising them on what to do if ICE agents turn up at schools. The letter emphasized that the U.S. Supreme Court has given children of undocumented children the right to obtain a public education.
“Above all, we are obligated protect the rights afforded to all our residents and ensure that students attend safe, welcoming schools. The best approach for local communities is to have a plan in place so that everyone in our state, including young students, are supported respectfully and fairly under the laws of our state and our nation,” Malloy said in a statement.
In his executive order, Trump threatened to withhold federal funding to cities which continue to institute “sanctuary city” policies.
Why bother obeying laws Malloy passes?
Yep. The federal gov could just decide not to fund their state too. That would be a crying shame
So does Malloy seek to have the state’s federal funding pulled?
With the sanctuary cities, the sanctuary schools and the various disregard of federal laws, Trump will be able to balance the budget with all the funds not expended.
Can I leave with GE ?
Why should states follow the homosexual sham marriage? All of a sudden they want their states rights!!! Give me a break.
Dems running out of options...
Looks to be a good state to cut federal funding from.
Prosecute him for conspiracy.
2017: "Trump isn't the King! We states can make our own laws or orders regarding immigration! Screw the Feds!"
If the Federal authorities do not step in then we all need to violate Federal Law. Do not pay your taxes and see what happens.
That has got to be a violation of the law.
Congress, fix this. Legislate the creation of federal bench warrants from DOJ that ICE can request on information that they have reason to believe an illegal named X to be at location Y, and then see what traitorous governors tell their subordinates and local police to do.
That has got to be a violation of the law.
...
Actually, it’s state’s rights under the Constitution.
We need to see some arrests. Seriously. Nobody is above the law, and until some of these mayors and governors feel the pain of prosecution and conviction, they will disobey the law with impunity.
Am I the only person who is annoyed when Democrat
politicians are referred to as “Democratic” instead
of plain old “Democrat”. Or is the term Democratic
equivalent to the term Republican?
Not according to the 10th amendment and the main text of the constitution, which makes immigration (protection against invasion) a federal matter.
So when does he go to jail like the lady who wouldn’t sign the gay marriage certficates?
Dunce of a demonic-rat governor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.