Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. is not a Democracy - So What Is It? Part 1
The Coach's Team ^ | 2/22/17 | Mark Herr

Posted on 02/22/2017 9:05:31 AM PST by Oldpuppymax

During my middle and high school years, I found it strange to say a pledge to the United States flag “and to the republic for which it stands,” while in the same class being taught the United States was a democracy. The teacher would correct my inquisitive nature by stating, “It’s semantics. Democracy and republic are really the same thing. The United States is a democratic republic.” Not satisfied with that justification of semantics and nuance, I continued to explore and discover the difference between U.S. republic and democracy and I’m still exploring it today.

From whom did the Framers derive the plan for America’s unique, republican form of government?

In his book Republic (Greek: Politeia), Plato argues the definition of justice and the role of the city and the individual in discovering the definition of justice (Book I & II). He defends educating the ‘Guardians’ of a just city (the collective) at an early age (Book III & IV). And in his ‘just city’, no distinction exists between man or woman, families, marriage, private property and he proclaims the best form of government consists of philosopher kings (i.e. truth seekers, incorruptible, just men, etc.) who are the best rulers for this “good city” (Book VI-X).

Cicero, in his work Of Republic (Latin: De Re Publica), defined republic as ‘property of the public’ (Book 1: 39). He surmised that the ideal form of government was to mix monarchy, aristocracy and democracy together (Book 1: 53). In Cicero’s view, leadership of this ‘ideal’ form of government was best left to nobility (the aristocracy/the Senate) to govern the perfect republic.

John Adams, in his 1786 effort A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States, explores republican forms of government throughout world history. During the 1787 U.S. Constitutional convention...

(Excerpt) Read more at thecoachsteam.com ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: democracy; republic

1 posted on 02/22/2017 9:05:31 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

A constitution based republic with a strong democratic leaning. Now, I’ll go read the article.


2 posted on 02/22/2017 9:08:29 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Bttt.

5.56mm


3 posted on 02/22/2017 9:13:30 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

A republic was created with a weak federal government to do specific enumerated things only and strong state governments do legislate almost everything else. Lincoln’s war f-ed that all up.


4 posted on 02/22/2017 9:20:33 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

In USA, the government is chartered to do specific things, only. If the people want government to do more, they must amend USConstitution. USConstitution is the supreme law of USA government and the land; it defines governments purpose and limits; so it is a charter or a contract. Changing the constitution is much harder to do than a mere 51% vote. The result is laws which adhere to the constitution, which do not deviate from the agreed upon purpose and limits of government, unless we decide we want to change that purpose or the limits. Then the constitution can be amended or replaced completely in a manner allowed by the current constitution.

In a democracy, with a simple 51% vote, government can do anything it wants. The people have no protection from moment to moment, emotional, temporary decisions. This allows subversives to incite or stage events to sway the government into doing things, which actually are to the peoples detriment. Stated another way, legislation is easier to create by far, than to undo.

A proper Constitutional Republic, is a house built on a rock; an actual foundation.
A democracy is a house built on shifting sand.


5 posted on 02/22/2017 10:11:19 AM PST by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

It started out as a republic but is, in modern times, more of a nation-state. Thanks to things like the Gonzales v Raich interpretation of the Commerce Clause (thanks a lot, George Bush), the last barriers to federal intrusion into state governance have been blown down. There is nothing between us, for all practical purposes, and the feds. Call it a republic if you like, but I call it a nation-state.

The notion that all power not enumerated to the federal government in the Constitution is reserved for the states was the tent pole holding the circus canvas off the audience in the stands. It’s gone, bubba.


6 posted on 02/22/2017 10:33:45 AM PST by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Not for nothing are the two major parties called “Democrats” and “Republicans.”


7 posted on 02/22/2017 10:46:36 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Not this tired old chestnut again.

Nowhere (authoritative) is it written that a republic can’t also be democratic. Saying that America isn’t a democracy is like saying Michael Phelps can’t run because he’s a swimmer.

An indirect democracy is still a democracy. But that isn’t a bad thing since a direct democracy eventually and invariably devolves into mob rule.

Very rarely does any government fit neatly into any single pigeonhole. The US is a democratic constitutional federal republic with elements of meritocracy, technocracy, oligarchy and theocracy, plus a soupçon of socialism.

Get over it, America IS a Democracy.


8 posted on 02/22/2017 10:54:58 AM PST by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo
Hahaha, yeah same thing I thought. I've had to correct people on that numerous times (err, but oddly enough - only Democrats making that mistake).
9 posted on 02/22/2017 12:05:01 PM PST by VaeVictis (~Woe to the Conquered~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veracious

Add to my previous:

In USA, the government is chartered to do specific things, only. If the people want government to do more, they must amend USConstitution. USConstitution is the supreme law of USA government and the land; it defines governments purpose and limits; so it is a charter or a contract. Changing the constitution is much harder to do than a mere 51% vote. The result is laws which adhere to the constitution, which do not deviate from the agreed upon purpose and limits of government, unless we decide we want to change that purpose or the limits. Then the constitution can be amended or replaced completely in a manner allowed by the current constitution.

In a democracy, with a simple 51% vote, government can do anything it wants. The people have no protection from moment to moment, emotional, temporary decisions. This allows subversives to incite or stage events to sway the government into enacting things, which actually are to the peoples detriment. Even the political vote, which provides the current batch of elected officials, is a temporary, moment to moment change, which sways back-n-forth over time. Stated another way, legislation is easier to create by far, than to undo.

A proper Constitutional Republic, is a house built on a rock; an actual foundation.
A democracy is a house built on shifting sand.


10 posted on 02/22/2017 12:42:04 PM PST by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paal Gulli

Of course you’re right. It’s a silly, pedantic posture to take. Republics are subsets of democracy, not stand-alone constructs.


11 posted on 02/23/2017 9:35:04 AM PST by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veracious

In USA, the government is chartered to do specific things, only. If the people want government to do more, they must amend US Constitution.


At first, yes. But take Prohibition for example. It took a constitutional amendment to enact Prohibition, but the War on Drugs was done with the stroke of a pen. We have strayed so far from ‘enumerated powers’ that it is hard to make the case that this is still a republic.


12 posted on 02/23/2017 9:39:16 AM PST by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson