Posted on 02/01/2017 11:01:02 AM PST by Louis Foxwell
3 Questions to Keep Future Muslim Terrorists Out of America Posted by Daniel Greenfield
The Nonimmigrant Visa application form filled out by the 9/11 hijackers asked, “Are you a member or representative of a terrorist organization?” They checked the box that said, ‘No’ and they were in.
The current incarnation of the form asks the same perfunctory and generic question. An actual terrorist is as likely to check the box as he is to finger a rosary while eating a ham sandwich and singing Hava Nagila. But since 9/11, the terrorist threat has evolved from foreign cells penetrating this country to domestic Islamist terrorists emerging out of Muslim settlements already occupying this country.
Most Islamic terrorists that the FBI has been dealing with had no specific terror plans at the time that they entered this country. Some Islamic terrorists, like the Tsarnaev perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombing, came here as children. Others, like Omar Mateen, the Pulse shooter, and Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood killer, contrived to be born in this country to foreign parents.
Immigration screening has to do more than just ask terrorists to check a box if they plan to fly planes into our skyscrapers. We must identify visitors and immigrants who are at a high risk of becoming terrorists in the first or second generation. The only way to do this is with a holistic strategy that examines the worldview of new immigrants and the Islamic communities they intend to be part of.
Instead of checking a perfunctory box, it is important to interrogate how a Muslim applicant views his religion and its interaction with the rest of the world. And to examine the mosque he plans to attend.
For example, attendees at the infamous Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia included Nidal Hasan, its former Imam was Al Qaeda leader Anwar Al-Awlaki, and a number of key figures associated with the mosque were linked to Islamic terrorism. Any Muslim immigrants planning to attend the mosque could be considered at high risk for engaging in terrorism regardless of their stated views. Our current screening methods are laughably crude.
The immigrant visa form asks about engaging in and funding terrorism. It does not however specify what a terrorist group is. Muslims define terrorism differently and do not consider many of the Islamic terror groups listed on the State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organizations list to be terrorists.
It asks about membership in the “Communist or other totalitarian party” and participation in various Columbian terrorist and militant organizations. Despite the thousands of people killed by Islamic terrorists in this country in the last few decades, it fails to ask anything about specific Islamist groups.
That should change.
Despite all the assurances about vetting, the forms don’t even bother to ask about membership in Al Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas or their parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood is to Islamic terrorism what the Communist party was to subversive and terrorist groups during the Cold War.
The Muslim Brotherhood is a totalitarian organization. Its motto is, “Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the Quran is our law; Jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” This credo reflects the objective of a theocratic Islamic State to be achieved through any means: including violence. Its members have perpetrated and aided Islamic terrorism here and around the world. These include Osama bin Laden, Yasser Arafat and the Brotherhood perpetrators of the genocide in Sudan.
Any Muslim immigrant who had ties to the Brotherhood has falsely answered the question and should be deported. If he falsely answered this question on his naturalization application, he should be subject to denaturalization and deported. Any Muslim who has subsequently become involved with Muslim Brotherhood front groups such as CAIR, ISNA, the MSA and countless others, should be investigated for pre-existing links with the terror network and prevented from becoming a citizen of this country.
Communities where Muslim immigrants propose to settle should be tested for their extremism levels as defined by the preponderance of Muslim Brotherhood institutions. Muslim immigrants who seek out communities under the influence of Brotherhood institutions should be considered at a higher risk of engaging in terrorism either in the first or second generation without regard for their current views.
Our goal is not just to stop terror plots now. Our goal must be to stop terrorism a decade from now.
Our counterterrorism is reactive instead of proactive. Reactive counterterrorism is measured by the time we have to react. When a terrorist opens fire in a shopping mall, reaction time is measured in minutes or seconds. His original descent into Islamic terror plots may go on for months or years. But the closer we get to the source of the problem, the more lead time we have until we are no longer reactive, but proactive. Instead of rushing to stop the next attack, we can transform the entire battlefield.
That must be our objective.
Our biggest problem is that we aren’t asking the right questions. Asking a Muslim if he is a terrorist is the wrong question. Islamic terrorists don’t see themselves as terrorists. They view themselves as devout Muslims. That is how we must see them if we are to find them out and stop them before they strike.
The root cause of Islamic terrorism is the idea that Muslims are superior and non-Muslims are inferior. Exposing this conviction won’t be done with a terrorism check box. Many Muslims who go on to commit acts of terror in the name of Islamic Supremacism have no such plans when they enter the country. They do however believe that there is a primal struggle between Muslims and non-Muslims. It is this belief that they eventually put into practice at some later date by actually engaging in Islamist violence.
Instead of asking them whether they are terrorists, we ought to ask them how they view their participation in American life in light of the Koranic verse that commands Muslims, "O you who believe, do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends. ”And whether they are willing to disavow the message of such terrorist verses of the Koran as, “Do not take friends from them unless they migrate in the Way of Allah. But if they turn away (from Islam), seize them and kill them wherever you find them.”
If they are not willing to disavow calls for the murder of non-Muslims, such as, "I will cast terror into the hearts of non-believers. Therefore strike off their heads”, they present a serious terrorism risk.
Can we really afford to allow Muslim immigrants into the United States who believe that they ought to "fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief: i.e. worshiping others besides Allah) and the religion will all be for Allah"? What better predictor of terror risk could there be than those who believe that they must “kill the non-believers wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them?” This is the origin of Islamic terrorism. It’s the acid test for every Muslim migrant.
It all comes down to three simple questions.
1. Have you ever had any associations with the Muslim Brotherhood or any of its front groups?
2. Will you commit to avoiding associations with Brotherhood mosques and other entities in this country? Are you aware that you may be deported if you do not?
3. Do you disavow the following verses of the Koran calling for violence against non-Muslims?
Such simple questions are far more relevant than a terrorism check box because they address what terrorists actually believe, not what we believe about them. They will not stop an active terrorist, but asking them will help keep out the terrorists of tomorrow.
They are not the final step. But they are a first step that can easily be taken next.
Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center
Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.
I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.
I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.
FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought.
Lou
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fiGVhiSe7Es/UC2iXPZr6dI/AAAAAAAAIBo/dnH7JqKKqVQ/s1600/sidepicture.jpg"left")
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post.
The only problem I see is the fact that it is considered highly moral and honorable for a musim to lie to an infidel (us) to advance the cause of islam.
Excellent questions. They are a beginning.
This makes sense.
It won’t stop taquiyya by a person committed to terrorism.
But it might stop an islamist who hasn’t yet committed to terrorism.
Just one is enough:
1. Are you a Muslim?
Yeah?
finger a rosary while eating a ham sandwich and singing Hava Nagila
*******************************************
Maybe we should try this........
Here’s a serious question that NO ONE in government has the stones to answer honestly: Why do we need ANY muslims at all coming into the country? What is the net benefit for the American Taxpayer?
why would anybody, especially a would-be terrorist, answer no to this question?... especially because of the second part about being deporting...
It’s sad when no one in the press mentions Israelis are banned from entering most Islamic countries. Used to be if your passport was stamped with the Israel mark, you couldn’t get in until Israel stopped stamping them.
Muslim immigrants need to go through a 3 hour intensive interview where the above issues are discussed. They should also be asked: do you believe Israel has a right to exist? How do you characterize Jews? Would it be a problem to live next door to one? Do you believe Sharia law is the best law to live under? Would you try to change the American system to follow Sharia?
I could go on & on. If they don’t embrace Israel & Jews with open arms & utterly renounce Sharia the should be barred from entering the US. Children should be questioned separately from their parents so you can figure out if parents might be lying. The fewer Muslim immigrants we have, the happier I’ll be.
hear, hear...
A.1 "Boosh" (hold for further questioning)
A.2 "The Jooos" (deny entry)
A.3 "The Zionist Entity" (remand to Israel for trial)
Give them this question, If we were to tell you the only way you are getting in America is if you behead someone for us and if they say yes....
Wrong...
THEY WILL JUST LIE. LYING TO INFIDELS IS OK AND IT’S EVEN GOT A NAME - TAQIYYA
The one and only question is: “How would you like a bite of this nice juicy Wendy’s Baconator sandwich?”
“Asking a Muslim if he is a terrorist is the wrong question. Islamic terrorists don’t see themselves as terrorists. They view themselves as devout Muslims.”
How many of the ‘535 PRINCES of the UNIVERSE’ in DC understand that devout muzzys consider lying to what they consider infidels is just plain OK if it gets them their Caliphate across the world ?
And , they consider the USA just a passing fancy of a few white folks who escaped Europe to a new place.
They think in a century-way, not years,decades let alone tomorrow..They lose a child to the bomb they dressed him/her up in and go back home and make another one thinking their allah is pleased with them...
2. Take whatever time you time to finish eating all of it completely.
3. When completed, we'll talk more about your entry into the United States.
Yes. I’d only believe them if in addition to answering the questions they would eat a ham sandwich and drink a beer in the presence of the agent.
They will just lie about these three questions also.
They need to be tracked & surveilled; have the county sheriff deputize law abiding citizens to do this.
From the article:
“It all comes down to three simple questions.
1. Have you ever had any associations with the Muslim Brotherhood or any of its front groups?
2. Will you commit to avoiding associations with Brotherhood mosques and other entities in this country? Are you aware that you may be deported if you do not?
3. Do you disavow the following verses of the Koran calling for violence against non-Muslims?”
Freedom of religion implies that we are talking about a Religion rather than a black cult of willing murderers aka islam. If an imam can order a believer to do something, and that person MUST do it, regardless of what, say no more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.