Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

I’m a staunch conservative, but there’s got to be something better than the intentionally misnomered “right to work” legislation. I’m not a union supporter, either, but right to work is only good for businesses, not employees. I live in a rtw state. Basically, an employer can terminate an employee for any reason or no reason at all, without notice. Employee handbooks explain it as “You can leave for any or no reason, without notice, without penalty, and the company can terminate under the same terms.” But if a person leaves without notice, when his prospective new job HR calls the company he left, he will ask, “Is he eligible for rehire?” Which is just a sneaky way of getting an illegal bad report. If a person deserves to be terminated, fine. But companies can easily use this law unfairly.


4 posted on 01/08/2017 3:17:31 PM PST by Flaming Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Flaming Conservative
Everytime I worked for a union (only when it was required) I got in trouble for working to hard or to fast. One union actually insisted that I sabatoge the product we were building.

I quit all of them.

Never had a problem finding or keeping a job. If you need help keeping a job, you're doing something wrong.

5 posted on 01/08/2017 3:27:48 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative

>
I’m a staunch conservative, but there’s got to be something better than the intentionally misnomered “right to work” legislation. I’m not a union supporter, either, but right to work is only good for businesses, not employees. I live in a rtw state. Basically, an employer can terminate an employee for any reason or no reason at all, without notice. Employee handbooks explain it as “You can leave for any or no reason, without notice, without penalty, and the company can terminate under the same terms.” But if a person leaves without notice, when his prospective new job HR calls the company he left, he will ask, “Is he eligible for rehire?” Which is just a sneaky way of getting an illegal bad report. If a person deserves to be terminated, fine. But companies can easily use this law unfairly.
>

Easy solution that doesn’t take the govt to institute: Hire yourself.

The positions filled by employers are NOT the possession of the employed.


6 posted on 01/08/2017 3:34:12 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative

When someone is terminated, they are usually given two weeks severance (sometimes more) which is equivalent to two weeks notice, except they don’t have to work those two weeks and can use those days looking for a new job.


10 posted on 01/08/2017 3:46:12 PM PST by bobk333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative

“I live in a rtw state. Basically, an employer can terminate an employee for any reason or no reason at all, without notice.”

Pretty sure the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prevents that.


11 posted on 01/08/2017 3:50:11 PM PST by Mafe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative
If a person deserves to be terminated, fine. But companies can easily use this law unfairly.

I'm in an "at will" employment state. My company can dump my butt anytime they want, and need not disclose a reason.

But they don't. Why? Because I'm productive enough to be worth my salary.

12 posted on 01/08/2017 3:51:21 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative

“employer can terminate an employee for any reason or no reason at all”

I think that’s called “right of association”, and it’s a natural right that should not be infringed for anyone.


13 posted on 01/08/2017 3:56:22 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative
Why would they? Why would a company fire someone for no reason, and then go through he hassle and expense of finding, vetting, maybe training a replacement,? You call yourself a conservative --conservatives don't think businessmen are automatically some kind of unfair self-defeating tyrant.
26 posted on 01/08/2017 4:50:24 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative
But companies can easily use this law unfairly.

How so? If one is a solid and dependable employee than no company would want to get rid of that person. If the company was going under, then it wouldn't matter if there was a Right-to-Work law or not anyhow.

28 posted on 01/08/2017 4:59:08 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative

“I’m staunch conservative”
With all due respect, if you’re ok with forcing people to join unions and watching part of thier wages confiscated and sent to the Rats whether they like it or not then you sir are not a staunch conservative.


29 posted on 01/08/2017 5:13:53 PM PST by gibsonguy (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Flaming Conservative
Basically, an employer can terminate an employee for any reason or no reason at all, without notice.

Easy fire means easy hire. If the employer has to essentially marry an applicant (in the sense that firing an employee is as much hassle as getting a divorce), then the employer is much less likely to take a chance on an applicant. HR paperwork and bureaucratic CYA before you can hire anybody.

30 posted on 01/08/2017 5:24:40 PM PST by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson