Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Holding property owners liable for damages related to disarming customers may infringe on property rights.
1 posted on 12/09/2016 6:30:58 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
Holding property owners liable for damages related to disarming customers may infringe on property rights.

Disagree. If a property owner makes a conscious decision to deprive another citizen of their Constitutionally protected right, then they should be held liable for any damage/injury due to that decision.

2 posted on 12/09/2016 6:33:08 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

If I lived there and wanted to carry,I would stay my ass out of places that did not want me with my gun.


3 posted on 12/09/2016 6:34:26 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I’ve been thinking the same needs to be in place for places of employment. My work building (which generally only has employees, no customers) has the “no weapons” sign in place. I hold a concealed permit. I would think this means my company assumes responsibility for my safety, since they are preventing me from doing so.


4 posted on 12/09/2016 6:35:08 AM PST by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Holding property owners liable for damages related to disarming customers may infringe on property rights.


I’m not seeing that. They have the right to disarm you, but they are then responsible for your safety. On the other hand, if they don’t disarm you, they put that responsibility squarely in your lap. You may choose to arm yourself or not.


5 posted on 12/09/2016 6:36:43 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I think a similar bill in another state (I forget which) ran into issues and was modified dramatically.

A better approach might be to make them provide security, but not just a bouncer with a gun.

Fed buildings don’t allow you to bring in guns, but they do:

1)Run background checks on all employees.
2)Physically screen all visitors.
3)Have armed security patrolling the “gun free” grounds and buildings 24x7.


7 posted on 12/09/2016 6:37:26 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain; rjsimmon

An argument can be made that by removing the ability to defend oneself, the proprietor who forces disarmament assumes an increased duty of safety.


8 posted on 12/09/2016 6:38:28 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Not at all.

It shows that the owner has the responsibility of providing a safe environment for all who enter the premises. No different than fire codes, building codes, etc.


9 posted on 12/09/2016 6:39:14 AM PST by Gamecock (Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I think the person who would otherwise be armed and chose to enter the store anyway, made a calculated risk and made a decision. They are accountable too. Best bet would be to take your business elsewhere.

But if they’re going to pass this law it should apply to everyone including the govt. offices. Continue to check everybody at the courthouse just stop and ask for the paper.


11 posted on 12/09/2016 6:40:43 AM PST by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Actions have consequences. Too many libs and their ilk firmly believe that no consequences attend to their very bad ideas. Like depriving others of their fundamental right to protect themselves and their loved ones. Time they were disabused of that.


13 posted on 12/09/2016 6:43:43 AM PST by Noumenon (Proud Irredeemable Deplorable, heavily armed Infidel. Islam delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I disagree with this and find it pretty much the same as holding firearms manufacturers liable for what others do with the guns the manufacture.


14 posted on 12/09/2016 6:46:41 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

My right to defend myself trumps that.
That right does not end at the property line.


15 posted on 12/09/2016 6:49:10 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Holding property owners liable for damages related to disarming customers may infringe on property rights.

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Do you have a similar authoritative statement for us regarding property rights?

Assuming such statement boils down to "The right of the people to keep and bear property shall not be infringed", how do you determine which right is infringed by the other?

What are these property rights so many lay claim to?

16 posted on 12/09/2016 6:49:56 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I’ve seen reports that some insurance companies pressure businesses to ban guns on the premises, as a “safety” measure. This would counterbalance that.


23 posted on 12/09/2016 7:03:00 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

The property holders of gun free zones have nothing to fear from me. If they can enforce me not carrying in their establishment, I don’t go in. No going to venues with weapons screening for me.


29 posted on 12/09/2016 7:30:22 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (I thank God, Broom Hillary was stopped. Now, moving on, I pray for Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

43 posted on 12/09/2016 7:58:11 AM PST by Scythian_Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3503071/posts?page=1#1

We need this in Texas. (Paraphrasing the signs language below)

A lot of businesses have had signs saying ‘don’t carry concealed unless you have a permit’ & citing the 30.06 section of the state code.

Since the open carry passed, a number of businesses that previously didn’t have signs about weapons put up both the ‘don’t carry concealed’ and ‘don’t carry openly’ sections of the state code.


49 posted on 12/09/2016 8:16:36 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Nonsense. A TRUE GfZ is an airport terminal. If a business cannot provide this level of protection, they have no business demanding people go unarmed.


60 posted on 12/09/2016 9:25:26 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

The neat thing about MO ccw law is that even if a sign is posted, a ccw licensee who chooses to ignore the sign and is found out to be carrying, unless they refuse to leave and a peace officer is called, the penalty s a $100 fine and is not a crime, but merely a citation....

Go ahead and post! Unless you have metal detectors and a pat down crew to verify ( aka TSA) no one will ever know unless the gravest extreme occurs.

RsMO 571.215 etc

I love MO!


61 posted on 12/09/2016 10:30:42 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Kinda neat, here in MO even if a premises is off limits or posted, the law already is agreeable to CCW licensees....

RSMO:

Permit does not authorize concealed firearms, where—penalty for violation.

571.107. 1. A concealed carry permit issued pursuant to sections 571.101 to 571.121, a valid concealed carry endorsement issued prior to August 28, 2013, or a concealed carry endorsement or permit issued by another state or political subdivision of another state shall authorize the person in whose name the permit or endorsement is issued to carry concealed firearms on or about his or her person or vehicle throughout the state. No concealed carry permit issued pursuant to sections 571.101 to 571.121, valid concealed carry endorsement issued prior to August 28, 2013, or a concealed carry endorsement or permit issued by another state or political subdivision of another state shall authorize any person to carry concealed firearms into:

(1) Any police, sheriff, or highway patrol office or station without the consent of the chief law enforcement officer in charge of that office or station.

(2) Within twenty-five feet of any polling place on any election day. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of the polling place shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(3) The facility of any adult or juvenile detention or correctional institution, prison or jail. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of any adult, juvenile detention, or correctional institution, prison or jail shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(4) Any courthouse solely occupied by the circuit, appellate or supreme court, or any courtrooms, administrative offices, libraries or other rooms of any such court whether or not such court solely occupies the building in question. This subdivision shall also include, but not be limited to, any juvenile, family, drug, or other court offices, any room or office wherein any of the courts or offices listed in this subdivision are temporarily conducting any business within the jurisdiction of such courts or offices, and such other locations in such manner as may be specified by supreme court rule pursuant to subdivision (6) of this subsection. Nothing in this subdivision shall preclude those persons listed in subdivision (1) of subsection 2 of section 571.030 while within their jurisdiction and on duty, those persons listed in subdivisions (2), (4), and (10) of subsection 2 of section 571.030, or such other persons who serve in a law enforcement capacity for a court as may be specified by supreme court rule pursuant to subdivision (6) of this subsection from carrying a concealed firearm within any of the areas described in this subdivision. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of any of the areas listed in this subdivision shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(5) Any meeting of the governing body of a unit of local government; or any meeting of the general assembly or a committee of the general assembly, except that nothing in this subdivision shall preclude a member of the body holding a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement from carrying a concealed firearm at a meeting of the body which he or she is a member. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises. Nothing in this subdivision shall preclude a member of the general assembly, a full-time employee of the general assembly employed under Section 17, Article III, Constitution of Missouri, legislative employees of the general assembly as determined under section 21.155, or statewide elected officials and their employees, holding a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement, from carrying a concealed firearm in the state capitol building or at a meeting whether of the full body of a house of the general assembly or a committee thereof, that is held in the state capitol building;

(6) The general assembly, supreme court, county or municipality may by rule, administrative regulation, or ordinance prohibit or limit the carrying of concealed firearms by permit or endorsement holders in that portion of a building owned, leased or controlled by that unit of government. Any portion of a building in which the carrying of concealed firearms is prohibited or limited shall be clearly identified by signs posted at the entrance to the restricted area. The statute, rule or ordinance shall exempt any building used for public housing by private persons, highways or rest areas, firing ranges, and private dwellings owned, leased, or controlled by that unit of government from any restriction on the carrying or possession of a firearm. The statute, rule or ordinance shall not specify any criminal penalty for its violation but may specify that persons violating the statute, rule or ordinance may be denied entrance to the building, ordered to leave the building and if employees of the unit of government, be subjected to disciplinary measures for violation of the provisions of the statute, rule or ordinance. The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to any other unit of government;

(7) Any establishment licensed to dispense intoxicating liquor for consumption on the premises, which portion is primarily devoted to that purpose, without the consent of the owner or manager. The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to the licensee of said establishment. The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to any bona fide restaurant open to the general public having dining facilities for not less than fifty persons and that receives at least fifty-one percent of its gross annual income from the dining facilities by the sale of food. This subdivision does not prohibit the possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of the establishment and shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises. Nothing in this subdivision authorizes any individual who has been issued a concealed carry permit or endorsement to possess any firearm while intoxicated;

(8) Any area of an airport to which access is controlled by the inspection of persons and property. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of the airport shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(9) Any place where the carrying of a firearm is prohibited by federal law;

(10) Any higher education institution or elementary or secondary school facility without the consent of the governing body of the higher education institution or a school official or the district school board, unless the person with the concealed carry endorsement or permit is a teacher or administrator of an elementary or secondary school who has been designated by his or her school district as a school protection officer and is carrying a firearm in a school within that district, in which case no consent is required. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of any higher education institution or elementary or secondary school facility shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(11) Any portion of a building used as a child care facility without the consent of the manager. Nothing in this subdivision shall prevent the operator of a child care facility in a family home from owning or possessing a firearm or a concealed carry permit or endorsement;

(12) Any riverboat gambling operation accessible by the public without the consent of the owner or manager pursuant to rules promulgated by the gaming commission. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of a riverboat gambling operation shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(13) Any gated area of an amusement park. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of the amusement park shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(14) Any church or other place of religious worship without the consent of the minister or person or persons representing the religious organization that exercises control over the place of religious worship. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(15) Any private property whose owner has posted the premises as being off-limits to concealed firearms by means of one or more signs displayed in a conspicuous place of a minimum size of eleven inches by fourteen inches with the writing thereon in letters of not less than one inch. The owner, business or commercial lessee, manager of a private business enterprise, or any other organization, entity, or person may prohibit persons holding a concealed carry permit or endorsement from carrying concealed firearms on the premises and may prohibit employees, not authorized by the employer, holding a concealed carry permit or endorsement from carrying concealed firearms on the property of the employer. If the building or the premises are open to the public, the employer of the business enterprise shall post signs on or about the premises if carrying a concealed firearm is prohibited. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises. An employer may prohibit employees or other persons holding a concealed carry permit or endorsement from carrying a concealed firearm in vehicles owned by the employer;

(16) Any sports arena or stadium with a seating capacity of five thousand or more. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises;

(17) Any hospital accessible by the public. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises of a hospital shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises.

2. Carrying of a concealed firearm in a location specified in subdivisions (1) to (17) of subsection 1 of this section by any individual who holds a concealed carry permit issued pursuant to sections 571.101 to 571.121, or a concealed carry endorsement issued prior to August 28, 2013, shall not be a criminal act but may subject the person to denial to the premises or removal from the premises. If such person refuses to leave the premises and a peace officer is summoned, such person may be issued a citation for an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars for the first offense.


62 posted on 12/09/2016 10:38:31 AM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson