Posted on 10/31/2016 9:07:23 AM PDT by Leo Carpathian
With all the facts coming to light as the "missing" Emails are surfacing, will the big question of World's Biggest Lie about Benghazi attack be cracked?
We now know that there was shady business of supplying Lybian arms to "rebels" in Syria. Benghazi annex was involved in logistics.
Armed protection of the annex was not sufficient, repeated requests ignored.
Where exactly were Hillary and Barack Hussein during the attack when the annex was under fire?
They knew the attack was not the result of the video, they claimed that it was right after.
For two weeks Obama government was insisting on the video causing the attack and death of 4 persons. This being all over TV, media and Obama telling the World at UN forum. Still lying to families of heroes.
The big question is: "Who initiated and ordered the lies about video being the cause of attack on Benghazi annex? Obama? Hillary Clinton? Who?
There should be some trail in the emails. There should be records at NSA.
FBI has now more stuff thanks to Weiner, any answers there?
Will the guilty (traitors?) be brought to justice? Or are we stampeding to become lawless banana republic with more liars and criminals in charge?
Americans deserve to know and justice to be served.
Here is some trail of history:
from
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2014/05/02/the-6-biggest-lies-about-benghazi/
These are merely the lies, not the open questions. The open question include:
Was there gunrunning through the annex in Benghazi?
Why was there no armed protection for American personnel in Benghazi?
Where exactly were Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama during the event, and what did they do to help the men under fire?
Why did the Obama administration insist for weeks that a YouTube video had driven the Benghazi attacks? Then there’s the biggest question of all: why didn’t the media care about any of this before the election of 2012?
from
https://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2016/04/25/state-department-still-covering-for-clinton-and-obamas-benghazi-lies/
As we consider Hillary Clinton’s blatant Benghazi lies to the American people, mindful that Democrats are poised to nominate her as their 2016 presidential candidate, something else bears remembering. Much attention has been focused on the classified information aspect of Clinton’s email scandal, because that’s where she is most in jeopardy of criminal charges. But Clinton’s purpose in recklessly setting up a private email system for conducting government business was not to flout laws protecting intelligence related to our national defense. That was a foreseeable consequence -- but it wasn’t the objective.
.... Clinton’s purpose was to escape accountability for her flawed judgment and actions. To achieve it, she quite intentionally circumvented federal laws that require government officials to maintain accessible records and disclose them to the public, Congress, and the courts.
... That such a person could be a plausible major-party candidate for president is an appalling commentary on the state of our nation.
from
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/09/hillary_lies_says_benghazi_station_chief_hicks.html
One wonders if Hillary Clinton will call Gregory Hicks a liar, just as she has called Benghazi parents Patricia Smith and Charles Woods liars for their testimony that she blamed the terrorist attack on an Internet video in front of their son’s caskets as their bodies were brought home.
... We have the testimony of Gregory Hicks, deputy chief of mission in Libya and a foreign service officer for 22 years. He was demoted to desk officer for telling the truth that those in Libya knew it was a terrorist attack from the "get-go," that there was no "protest" or mention of one from anyone on the ground, and that the infamous YouTube video was "a non-event" in Libya
Don’;t forget the shooting down of the helicopter that had SEAL TEAM SIX in it!!! I’ll bet there was info of their movements!
I have always believed the attack was a hit orchestrated to silence Stevens. He knew too much.
It’s my understanding that the Benghazi information went to a secret google cloud server.
I hope some hacker caught it.
She and 0bama left those men to die and killed others to cover it up.
Who told Hillary to lie about Benghazi video???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C__gRs_qDs8
We will find out.
Now that we know the emails exists - congress can subpoena them for the Benghazi investigation or any other investigation they have open. Nobody can refuse congressional subpoena besides Hillary who can apparently get away with deleting emails that were requested.
Wikileaks has shown that there is an inner circle email conversation going around on private email - little doubt they would not have discussed strategy on official State email. I have wondered for some time if that is what wikileaks has and wants to release because you know Podesta was involved as was Brazille. Huma as always was smack in the middle.....
The FBI nor congress will know about this prior to the election - the only chance we have to see them is wikileaks.
Excellent instincts.
the official story is that the chopper was brought down by a lucky RPG head but there is strong rumors that it was a MANPADS.
A week or so before the Bengazi attacks I remember a trial balloon being floated by the govt. The idea was to return the blind shiek. I thought this was crazy, and the trial balloon was as not floated again.
IMHO, the actual attack in Bengazi was supposed to net ambassador Stevens so a trade could be set up.
So our elite set it up, left the he place basically defenseless, and when reports came in about the attack Hillary and Obama ignored it cause it was pre planned and was supposed to be over quickly.
What Hill/Obama did not count on was the bravery of our men near on the ground. Once the Bengazi natives started meeting stiff resistance they started getting angry. Angry enough that they through the plan out the window and either killed Stevens or would have had he still been alive.
A short poem you won’t forget
Do you recall the President referring to the Benghazi incident as “a bump in the road?”
At the end of the interview he asked if he could make a comment on Benghazi and, of course, the anchor said “yes.”
He then thanked Fox News for keeping the Benghazi story in the news, since other news organizations are not.
He said the Seals who died deserve the public knowing the truth about the whole affair.
The poem was written by an anonymous Marine Corps officer:
“THE BATTLING BOYS OF BENGHAZI”
We’re the battling boys of Benghazi,
No fame, no glory, no paparazzi.
Just a fiery death in a blazing hell,
Defending our country we loved so well.
It wasn’t our job, but we answered the call,
Fought to the Consulate and scaled the wall.
We pulled twenty countrymen from the jaws of fate
Led them to safety and stood at the gate.
Just the two of us and foes by the score,
But we stood fast to bar the door.
Three calls for reinforcement, but all were denied,
So we fought and we fought and we fought ‘til we died.
We gave our all for our Uncle Sam,
But Barack and Hillary didn’t give a damn.
Just two dead Seals who carried the load
No thanks to us, we were just
“Bumps In The Road”.
So, will this reach every American with a computer? Or do we act like the press and give a pass to the people who literally sat there in the White House and watched the Seals’ execution on live streaming video and did absolutely nothing?
“What difference does it make?”
And she wants to be the next President!
I saw Baier and the ‘panel’ talk about this. The panel agreed that the Blind Sheikh would be returned BY YEAR’S END.
Then came 9/11.
Haven’t watched the panel since. They’re coopted.
I remember thinking why in the heck would we want to return the blind shiek?! Of course Obama as our president was enough to answer that question.
I believe Obama and company saw this as a twofer. Return the shiek and save Stevens to bolster re election.
As far as gun running, I have no doubt that was going on also. I just do not believe the attack itself was tied to it.
We all hypothesize a lot about Benghazi but what do we really know?
We know Hussein and Hellery were arming rebels in Libya. We now know those "rebels" were Al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood.....
We know Hussein is arming rebels in Syria. Who are the rebels in Syria? Al Qaeda, ISIS.....
What else do we know? We know Hussein has told us he is pro Muslim.
So what else do you need to know to explain WHY Hussein Obama blocked US forces from killing Muslim terrorists?
Of course it's not reasonable to believe Hussein is a Muslim traitor. But reasonable is not in question here, only the truth is.
Don’;t forget the shooting down of the helicopter that had SEAL TEAM SIX in it!!! I’ll bet there was info of their movements!
This is incorrect....... the SEAL’s volunteered in the middle of a firefight to go there to help the pinned down unit so they jumped onto a regular CH47 helicopter (not one of their usual spec ops birds). There was no movement by them that was planned in advance. It was a spontaneous reaction to an unanticipated enemy contact.
We were told an RPG got them and it is possible - it is a common tactic for insurgents to take high ground where they think our helicopters may fly in around an engagement and shoot RPG’s at helicopters. It would have been a lucky shot by them - it was a tragedy for us. That is what happened in Somalia (Blackhawk down).
Not everything is a conspiracy - the golden BB possibility always exists in combat.
Just my .02. I have seen the conspiracy theory that Benghazi was about Hillary arming (Iran-Contra anyone) anti-Khaddafi forces to fight in Libya. This theory posits that these weapons went to militants who then deployed them against us in Afghanistan. Perhaps this happened, but there is no evidence of this and if we had given them operable stinger missiles (dumbest thing ever) one would think that we would have lost far more choppers than we have (not to mention a commercial airliner or two).
I have also seen many people suggest a conspiracy theory to get rid of the SEAL team that got Bin Laden. That one seems ridiculous and again - my original point applies. On top of that, the SEAL teams are pretty big and people cycle onto and off of them continually so that is even more unlikely.
Do I think her email set-up was compromised and impacted our national security? Yes. It would be almost impossible for it not to be compromised. However, I don’t think it had anything to do with the tragic loss of the SEAL’s in combat on that day or some kind of obscure quid pro quo over Bin Laden.
Just my .02. There are so many events and stories with evidence to be really upset about so I don’t think it helps FR (or our cause) to get too excited about unsubstantiated theories. These theories generally start and end with the clickbait sites that are so often linked here. FRegards.
Vile woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.