Two questions : #1 What does Catalist and Atlas do ? function ?
(from the article):" " In full disclosure, I screwed up a business deal with First Tuesday earlier in the year when the second round of financing from Soros didn't come through. That is a relationship I need to fix. I handled that badly."
#2 Does anyone know about Soros money infusion, or the amount of that infusion ?
“What does Catalist do?”
That caught my attention too.
These were the days of the term “Journolist.” We all know what that meant.
To my thinking, this could be a similar clique of like-minded people, but I cannot come up with what the “Cat” in “Catalist” stands for.
Could it mean “Cataloguers”? As in Google and Bing?
We know that one legal website (Justia.com) in 2008 deleted from its website sections of a case that referred to the definition of “natural born citizen” so it magically wouldn’t appear in a web search.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2795647/posts]
“Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1’s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.
“In June 2008 no one was discussing Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162 (1875) with regard to Obama. In fact, those who were discussing the then Senator’s citizenship status had focused instead on his birth in Hawaii in a attempt to prove the future president was not born in the United States despite publication of the Senator’s short form computer generated Birth Certificate. It would not be until October of 2008 that Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility would be questioned as to his status as a dual citizen at the time of his birth.
“Meanwhile, at the “ Supreme Court Center” of the influential legal research website Justia.com, efforts were underway corrupting at least 25 Supreme Court cases by erasing references to the words “Minor V. Happersett” along with references to other relevant cases on the issue along with the insertion of misleading numerical citations. And In two documented cases actual text was removed.
“Clearly this was done in these specific cases in order to prevent their being found by internet researchers long before anyone had even begun to look for them, even before Obama would win the Democratic Nomination at the DNC Convention in Denver, Colorado in August ‘08. This is premeditation and intent to deceive.
“So far, 25 corrupted SCOTUS have been identified, and this number may continue to rise as the scope of the tampering becomes apparent. These cases all relied upon Minor, some specifically referencing its definition of Natural Born Citizen - a definition which makes Obama ineligible to be President as that definition is part of the holding and continuing precedent, issued from the highest court in our nation making it the law of the land, even now.
“The most extreme sabotage so far discovered appears to have been done to the landmark decision United States v. Wong Kim Ark which was sabotaged to remove “Minor v. Happersett” three times, along with one reference to “Scott v Sandford”, another to the Slaughterhouse Cases and some accompanying text relevant to the issue.
“These surgical alterations would alter and shape the national dialogue; leaving a persistent and incorrect interpretation of the meaning of the ‘natural born citizen’ clause.
“There is no doubt whatsoever that this was the specific intent of those responsible for this illegal editing of American history and law.”
— The Examiner | 10-20-2011 | Dianna Cotter