I was beginning to worry about the good Doctor.
He’s come around to the ABH (anybody but her) viewpoint slowly.
OH Boy! I was waiting to hear from this guy before I made up my mind on who to vote for.
I used to think very highly of Mr. Sowell.
I don't understand where his head or his heart is. This man voted for McCain and Romney, for gosh sakes!
hillary is bad enough that I would vote for Mickey Mouse instead of her.
Thomas Sowell, an affirmative action pseudo-intellectual who has fallen short...
What’s the danger of a Trump Presidency? Help me out here.
Another open borders think tank conservative heard from.
If it took him this long to figure that out - and that what applies to Clinton as an individual largely applies to the corrupt status quo as a whole - then his role has gone from opinion writer to historian.
that’s mighty w***e of him
...even though Donald Trump has no coherent vision that looks that promising, Hillary Clinton does have a vision...
But Hillary was the dangerous one. She had an agenda. She wanted to wield that presidential power to create a liberal utopia/nightmare. I consider her the single most dangerous person to ever run for president.
She’s serious. She could be a true despot that would make Obama look like a pushover in the “I’m gonna do it my way” corner.
And she’s been grooming it for decades. I think she sees herself as superhuman or, more accurately, sees the rest of us as canon fodder.
I don’t really have any reason to think that Trump is a small government type. He’s a lower tax and lower regulation guy. But for practical reasons as the opposite hurt the economy. But I don’t hear the small government vision. Which is essentially that the founders had it right when they thought that mans inherent nature is to oppress his fellow man. Thus you have a government which is small: Or only as large as necessary. This is in contract to the left of course, which acts as if we are fundamentally good but something in our lives/upbringing messes that all up. And once we can stop messing that up all will be right.
For the reason that the left has a vision that I am against, I can totally understand Dr. Sowell’s reply. Because I don’t really hear Trump advocating for smaller government the way conservatives typically imagine it.
Does vote against Hillary mean that he will cast a vote for Trump? He doesn't say in this interview with that detestable punk Shapiro who is a dedicated NeverTrumper.
“Conservative” establishment purist who would rather go down with the Titanic gets a brief moment of half-assed “clarity”.
Donald Trump, to ally the fears and criticisms of many on the right, released a list of judges he would appoint. He did this for all the world to see and to scrutinize. Turns out his selections are top-notch as confirmed by the The Heritage Foundation and other conservative think tanks.
Crooked Hillary has not put forth a SINGLE judge she would nominate, and for good reason, because you can be sure they will be in the mold of Ginsberg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.
Thomas Sowell should be writing about his objection to the judges Donald Trump has put forward, not to some rediculous moral equivalency argument between Trump and Clinton. Irony is, that's usually his strong point ...attention to detail. Sadly, I've lost some measure of respect for Professor Sowell with this stand.
One of the best Conservative minds in the business. He realizes we simply cannot have that evil witch in the WH.
Gosh, he could be for McMuffin then?
Trump is like Nixon in one respect. A lot of us did not particularly like him, but the alternative was not an option.
So, Doctor Sowell, offer to help him find one. He will at least listen respectfully.
More of the NeverTrumpers are correcting their cranial/rectal inversion.
Either Trump or evil bitch will be the next president. To vote against one of them with any meaningful result means to for for the other one. Any ross perot style vote is a waste.