Loves the Mexican demand for an apology.
Nope. Let’s re-state the issue, clearly, firmly, respectfully and consistently. As a country, WE HAVE THE RIGHT to decide who we allow to enter our country, just as Mexico enjoys that same right.
No apologies; as every word he said was the truth.
Thank God for Trump.
Yeb! would be campaigning for Hillary by now.
(and he might be yet)
But, but, but Fox Newless reports that the main take away from yesterday was the very unpresidential “boastful tone” of his speech.
Fox Newsless has two camps: All in for Hillary and Trump is Unqualified. There may be an exception or two besides Hannity but I couldn’t name them.
My Fox-Time these days is limited to a fast forward through the Bret Baier show to the panel and then 2 or 3 minutes checking to see if they are still pushing their anti-Trump Themes. That’s all the time it takes.
The advantage of this is that I get more Freeper-Time while plowing through a long but pretty good book: Quincunx by Charles Pallister.
This is why the Times is supporting Hillary Clinton, who will break any law she feels like if she is elected.
Entities as powerful as the New York Times have a higher standard. When they advocate lawlessness at the governmental level, it should be THEY that are declared "outlawed", in the old-fashioned sense of the word, by ordinary citizens.
Imagine Trump saying, I respect Mexico so much that I will propose that the United States of America adopts Mexico’s Humanitarian Immigration Laws.
‘Trumps core issue might be called Americanism.
‘Whatever the outcome of this election, these concerns are not going away. For they have arisen out of a deeply dissatisfied and angry electorate that is alienated from the elites of both parties.