Posted on 06/28/2016 5:48:28 AM PDT by NOBO2012
The suffragettes of the early 20th century demanded a woman’s right to vote.
The Smufragettes, the 21st century heirs of that proud legacy, demand a woman’s right to have an abortion anywhere, anytime and now apparently by anyone.
I wish the Supreme Court would be half as vigilant with respect to our Second Amendment Rights – which are specifically spelled out in the Constitution - as they are abortion rights – which are derived from an “interesting,” and unprecedented “privacy” interpretation of the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause that guarantees your right to not have your house searched without a warrant. (Aside: a “fetus” not being a “person” does not fall under the equal protection clause.)
You’ve come a long way, baby!
The Virginia Slim: Because No, Virginia, there isn’t a Santa Claus. Protect yourself.
Seriously, imagine the uproar if women who’ve had abortions were required to be placed in a data base! I think the smurfragettes would have a word or two to say about that.
Posted from: Michelle Obama’s Mirror
‘Seriously, imagine the uproar if women who’ve had abortions were required to be placed in a data base! I think the smurfragettes would have a word or two to say about that.’
Since out tax money is paying for these abortions, it looks like an idea whose time has come. All our medical info is on the internet, theirs should be too.
The Supreme Court = Coat Hanger Court
Or if they were merely kept in a selective service database.
Before Roe v. Wade, feminists said safe, legal abortions would put the back alley abortionist out of business.
After Roe v. Wade, the back alley abortionist moved onto Main Street and bought Congress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
