Does anyone remember when the Clinton’s argued that they were not getting a fair shake from Kenneth Starr? He had it in for the Clinton’s. He was a sex-crazed pervert. There was NO evidence of any of this, yet, his investigation was tainted. Liberals are always accepted at face value by the MSM.
Excellent and astute.
bookmark
This entire thing still revolves around an issue Trump did not need to begin.
Donald, we love you, but learn to shut up at times.
The better case to be made against the judge is based on the judge’s associations with La Raza and not the judge’s race. Even now Trump can maneuver and make that case and is probably already doing so.
I whole heartedly support Trump BUT I don’t think it politically wise to go after the judge EVEN THOUGH Trump has a point. You don’t win votes that way.
btw, you need to click on “this is an excerpt” box when posting an excerpt of an article, so that people know there is a more complete article at the link —otherwise, many who are interested may not click through
Why the heck doesn’t Trump use the judge’s race-based scholarship awards, including awards to illegal immigrants? And the judge’s activism with La Raza Lawyers Assn in favor of illegal immigration/immigrants? That’s grounds for the judge’s recusal. Is his research staff that bad? Does he even have a research staff?
I don’t know anything about this Judge except that he is Mexician. Can any of you educate me on more details about his views. Is he anti-immigration? I’ll do some ‘homework’ too. But, you guys are a wealth of information, so thank you in advance!
I watched Megyn Kelly tonight on this. She is dead to me. Nobody will free us of the politically correct jail we are in unless we vote for Trump. When did it become wrong to raise objection when one feels they are being treated unfairly?!? Oh no, it’s racism!! Unless you are complaining about a cinservative judge being biased, like that uppity Clarence Thomas.
Bump for later use.