Can she do that? Why isn’t she in jail? (rhetorical question)
Hillary, Cheryl, Huma.....bluster and lie all you want. Depend on your effing lawyers to advise you and recommend this diversion, obfuscation or that. Pay them an outrageous hourly rate.
Remember this, you hags, your lawyer isn’t the one who could go to the pokey.
Typical slimy trick of change the issue to avoid the real intent of what she is there for.
They must have hit a nerve. A good one.
Watch for a Michelle Fields type of allegation against the Bureau.
Gloria Allred and megyn kelly will be happy to aid and abet.
The fix is in. It’s a real shame that Integrity has been dropped from Fidelity and Bravery. They’ve become just another Federal Bureau.
Breitbart reported that Mills walked out when asked about the process they used to determine which emails to release to State and which ones to delete. She asserted attorney client privilege.
If she answered, she would have essentially been admitting to being in possession of materials stolen from the government and destroying evidence. A real difficulty for team Clinton is they don’t know what the FBI knows.
I think it is likely the FBI recovered the deleted emails so anything any of them say could be proven a lie.
Hillary isn’t paying their legal fees just to keep her chocolate chip cookie recipe a secret.
DoJ is in the tank for Hillary, that’s no surprise.
I’d love to know what the question was that got Mills flustered.
They aren’t used to anything but...”how did you become so magnificent”? “If you could be a tree...”? “What’s your favorite ice cream”? “You sure do take good care of yourself. I would’ve guessed you were under 50”!
My guess -— they wanted to know the motivation for the private server. It is obvious -— she wanted to avoid FOIA and be able to hide, control, and delete as necessary.
I talked to Gowdy’s committee months ago and sent them this clip for background. Also sent to FBI and several Justice. She was afraid of investigations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msLcjA3yXzo
a) The FBI was limited to questioning Mills about the email scandal but they asked her a question related to Clinton Foundation donations.
or
b) The FBI was limited to questioning Mills about Clinton Foundation donations but they asked her a question related to the email scandal.
Remember Ron Brown the Secy of Commerce. Don’t go beyond the line she draws. Nothing is out of her list of dark deeds.
CORRUPT!!! why would any serious investigation into the hag’s email scandal by the FBI agree to disallow questions of the hag’s team member about her involvement in the email scandal? Kudos to the one who coined the phrase; DC = district of criminals.
Good to have powerful friends. I can imagine where I would be right now if I walked out of an FBI interview.
A Sept 4, 2015 Politico.com article reports that Mills testified in a closed-door session of the Benghazi Committee, that she and Clinton lawyer David Kendall called the shots on which of Hillary’s emails should be deleted by Heather Samuelson, also a lawyer and Hillary minion. (Samuelson had been given jobs at State and the White House through the Spring of 2014. Conventional wisdom is that the e-mail deletions occurred later in 2014).
They wrapped this in layers of Atty-Client Privilege. If it seems odd that Mills would “testify” about this topic to the Committee, but not the FBI, remember that the Committee had the bad habit of not requiring testimony under oath.
Hillary frequently proclaims her desire to help with the investigation. So why hasn’t she released her “attorneys” from privilege on the question of how they decided which e-mails to delete? Why hasn’t the DoJ asked her to release them? Could Susan Serandon and some Bernie-loving “journalists” bring this up?