“Let’s pre-lose Election 2016” not a winning concept

Canada Free Press ^ | 05/06/17 | Judi McLeod

[Sean_Anthony]

It’s as if the mood has turned to: “Let’s all be one up on paper tiger Mitt Romney and throw the election by granting Election 2016 to Hillary Clinton.”

That’s where the ball’s bouncing with no one there to catch it.

Those who thought peace in the valley would automatically follow one out of 17 Republican nominee contenders left standing aren’t going to get it.

[Ciexyz]

If any candidate other than Trump had won the nomination, they would have subtly thrown the election and graciously allowed Hillary to win. Like Mitt did four years ago.

[HarleyLady27]

Just to get everyone ready for what’s to come:

It’s going to get worse than the primaries, we are going to get hit with so many downer Debbie articles about Trump and his run to the White House, we are going to be a lot more upset than we just got thru with...

Read the headlines, read the articles and keep in mind, there are billions and trillions of dollars, foreign countries, foreign banks, people who know blackmail like candy, people who are being paid off right and left...

We have to really toughen up and hang together and call out the articles...I wished they weren’t posted on here, but it seems that is all that is being printed...so we haven’t any choice...just be careful...I caught two this morning...research, research, research....

[Resettozero]

I wished they weren’t posted on here...

As an example, this article. So obscure in it's meager beginnings that one HAS to click on the link to even determine what it's regarding. No thanks.

[Robert DeLong]

Those Republicans desiring to support Hillary over Trump, even if it is by virtue of voting third party as a way to take cover, show that they do not care about America or Americans and are really own interested in preserving their gravy train rewarding them financially.

[VanDeKoik]

I’ll give the butthurt #NeverTrump people a week to get over it, then they are either going to help defeat Hillary, or be considered her supporters.

Trump won the votes fair and square, and in the open at a fraction of the cost. These people have no excuse to be angry at him.

[Robert DeLong]

own should be only

[ground_fog]

I think it helps Trump maintain his outsider status that weasels like Ryan don’t support him

[Gaffer]

Reminds me of the ZSU-23 (the “Gun” in VN) or the 2S6 later update except it’s on a truck body.

Added missiles to replace the guns for the +30K altitude shots. Guns for low altitude.

[goodnesswins]

I’ve got “conservative friends” suggesting Bernie might be a viable vote...or others talking 3rd party

[Gaffer]

My bad. Mea culpa....wrong thread... apologies...

[HarleyLady27]

Perfect example...thank you...this is why I posted my thoughts on this thread...Thank you FRiend...

[BobinIL]

What we are witnessing is the result of an ACTUAL anti-establishment candidate that actually has a chance of winning and disrupting the status-quo. The cockroaches from both parties are going to show their true colors. If anything comes out of this for me is that the republicans are no better than the democrats and it is NOT the people that they represent. D or R by there name makes no difference the only thing the establishment so called reprentatives care about is their special interest groups and how they will:

a. line their pockets with money
b. keep them in office so their pockets will continue being lined with money

These people don’t give a $#!t about the average voter or the well being of the country.

[Robert DeLong]

If Bernie is a consideration, then they are not conservatives.

The libertarian party candidate for President, Gary Johnson, was found to have an account with sugardaddie.com. So if they have a problem with Donald Trump's sexual escapades I would love to hear how they would justify voting for him.

Jill Stein leads in the Green Party primary process. Perhaps they can square their support for the party that wants to do away with all innovations that make life on earth more comfortable.

[faucetman]

I had to read the ENTIRE article to try and find out what the hell it was about. I still don’t know. I don’t even know if it’s an anti-Trump piece or not.

I did find out that it was dated, not current. Talking about future primaries that have already taken place.

Please don’t explain it to me. From what I did get out of it, I do know that I don’t care anyway.

[Sans-Culotte]

What we are witnessing is the result of an ACTUAL anti-establishment candidate that actually has a chance of winning and disrupting the status-quo. The cockroaches from both parties are going to show their true colors. If anything comes out of this for me is that the republicans are no better than the democrats and it is NOT the people that they represent. D or R by there name makes no difference the only thing the establishment so called reprentatives care about is their special interest groups and how they will: a. line their pockets with money b. keep them in office so their pockets will continue being lined with money These people don’t give a $#!t about the average voter or the well being of the country.

That's a sign that they are simply interested in power and nothing else; just like all the great commie/socialist tyrants of the 20th century.