Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Faced with blistering questions, Hillary STILL claims she never emailed classified info
Canada Free Press ^ | 03/09/16 | Robert Laurie

Posted on 03/09/2016 3:26:26 PM PST by Sean_Anthony

So far, in excess of 2,000 Hillary’s emails have been deemed classified due to the information they contained. They occupy multiple levels of classification, and at least a 100 of them were written by Hillary herself. Yet Hillary is still maintaining that she never sent even one shred of classified material. How is that possible?

As Bret Baier says in the clip below:

“The State Department has redacted and declared 2,101 of your work emails classified - at least at the confidential level. 44 Classified as secret, 22 classified as top secret. So you said at a March press conference in 2015 ‘I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material.’


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 20000manpads; 900fbifiles; classified; clinton; emails; foster; secbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2016 3:26:26 PM PST by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Denial to her is just a river in Egypt.


2 posted on 03/09/2016 3:28:30 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

In other news, Hillary told reporters from NBC, CBS, CNN, ABC, and the New York Times that it was really the end of the month instead of the beginning and they dutifully reported it as such...


3 posted on 03/09/2016 3:28:57 PM PST by OttawaFreeper ("You'd see a different game if nobody wore a helmet". NY Rangers' Barry Beck 1983)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

A month from now will be an announcement for no indictment. The media will all say “See I told you she did nothing wrong”


4 posted on 03/09/2016 3:29:04 PM PST by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Who are you going to believe?? me or the FBI with my server?? and my aide who set it up and now has immunity? and those (slowly) leaked e-mails? or that dead Ambassadors e-mails asking for help?? But I still want your vote. You can trust me, honest.


5 posted on 03/09/2016 3:29:25 PM PST by BipolarBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

For crying out loud! She was Secretary of State. Most of her official emails were classified at the least!


6 posted on 03/09/2016 3:29:59 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

According to Judge Andrew Napolitano, NOTHING is ever marked “classified”. It is not a term they use. They say “secret, or top secret”. Her statements are meaningless, and the judges says her repeated denials and use of the term “classified” are sure to annoy FBI Director Coomey.


7 posted on 03/09/2016 3:30:44 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

“Denial to her is just a river in Egypt.”

Debasement is just down the stairs!


8 posted on 03/09/2016 3:30:54 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Well, over 2,000 classified emails were found on her server.

She is still trying to hide behind people (her staff) changing the classification on emails coming to her. Most probably at her direction.

she was responsible.

The US Government policy on official government records (which include ANY communication directly associated with her work...is clear.

She is responsible for making sure that those are all protected and properly classified.

It is clear she did not do that.

She has dug herself a deep dark hole.

She is hoping that the Obama administration, because of her position in the campaign, will refuse to indict.

It will not matter if the FBI does the right thing and recommends to indict. Such a recommendation by an Obama appointee at the FBI will, IMHO, finish her.


9 posted on 03/09/2016 3:31:02 PM PST by Jeff Head (Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Is she still claiming she used her private server so she could use only one device?


10 posted on 03/09/2016 3:31:11 PM PST by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

“It’s not a lie if you believe it,” the culpability defense.


11 posted on 03/09/2016 3:32:25 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

It doesn’t matter what Clinton says to the public, she is responsible for protecting classified information whether it is marked or not and the people who need to know that most assuredly do.


12 posted on 03/09/2016 3:33:08 PM PST by erlayman (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Geez! She usually says, “None of the emails were marked classified,” so that she is kind of getting closer to the truth in a left-handed sort of way.


13 posted on 03/09/2016 3:33:32 PM PST by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

forget about asking her about ‘classified’. ask her if she ever sent ‘secret’ or ‘top secret’, SCI or SAP documents and quit pussy-footing around (no pun intended)


14 posted on 03/09/2016 3:34:00 PM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

She’s basically demanding the open, deliberate collapse of the rule of law, in front of everyone, solely to protect her ass.

Absolute defiance, against an entire country.

Literally in your face, America.

And half the country supports it.

What wicked, wicked evil.


15 posted on 03/09/2016 3:34:20 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
I wish Brett had more time, and that he was coached with better questions from Judge Napolitano.

They really need to prosecute the little "Top Secret Determiner Monkey" that resides in every server who will tell you, in the moment, in real time, if the email you are drafting really contains "Top Secret" information or not.

If he was doing his little monkey job, he would have warned Hillary that it appears she is writing about stuff that our enemies, or even friendly allies, shouldn't see.

If the monkey was doing his job in real-time, we wouldn't be talking about how "stuff" can be non-classified when it was created by Hillary, yet instantly classified once it was discovered.

A reporter should ask Hillary why certain emails on her server will be sequestered from public view for 25 years.

16 posted on 03/09/2016 3:34:51 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Hillary had Special Access Program (SAP) information in her emails. This is the highest level of security and even one leak of data at this level can get one life in prison.

Here is a Major (ret) describing these security classifications. His job was to protect and maintain access to one or two SAP programs. There are very few people that even know this program exists. He wasn’t even allowed to know what is in the SAP that he managed.

http://rense.com/general96/whatyouneed.html


17 posted on 03/09/2016 3:35:00 PM PST by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

According to Judge Andrew Napolitano, NOTHING is ever marked “classified”.
####################

Bingo - she is pulling out full lawyer speak and the “definition of what is is”


18 posted on 03/09/2016 3:35:22 PM PST by acw011 (Great Goooogly Mooogly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Didn’t Judge Nap say the other day that if they are going to give someone ‘immunity’ they are after facts that are going to indite? Maybe not Hillary, but someone else to fall under the bus for her....why can’t it be her, she did it...


19 posted on 03/09/2016 3:37:09 PM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

who are you going to believe, what you read in the Web news media and what your hear on News Max or the queen of criminal deception herself?


20 posted on 03/09/2016 3:38:05 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson