[Gaffer]

The SC guy kept saying 97% of scientists.....even mentioned Union of Concerned Scientists once. At one time I read over the list and qualifications of those “scientists” in the union. Pitiful pedigrees in large part - mostly nothing to do with any expertise in so-called AGW. IOW, a political science degree or history degree does not a “scientist” make.

Reminds me of the so-called 400 Constitutional Scholars who took out a full page NYT ad in 1998 that effectively said “..a Bl@w J@b is not an impeachable offense...”

[Sacajaweau]

This 97% gets me.

Let's see names, who they are, who pays them and who do they know....

97% is a ridiculous number which can only be obtained "with bias".

[Sacajaweau]

Thanks for the reference. They are indeed just an arm of the EPA. Scientists my a**.

[LinnieBeth]

Sorry don’t know abbreviations, what is IOW and Bl@w J@b. ?

[Madame Dufarge]

Yes, Kenji is our dog. Apparently, the claim is true, all that is required to be a member of the illustrious group of “concerned scientists” is a valid credit card. No discerning questions were asked of me when I prepared Kenji’s application and no follow up check after the application was done. I simply put in his name, address, and provided a valid credit card that matched the address.

Here is his letter of acceptance....

The newest member of the Union of Concerned Scientists

[bray]

That survey was done at a Global Warming convention and has no validity to reality, yet quoted over and over.

Pray America is waking