Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Grossly Un-American, Supreme Court Justices Have Ruled Against Traditional Marriages
Canada Free Press ^ | 07/12/15 | Jerry McConnell

Posted on 07/12/2015 6:59:09 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

hat New Travesty Awaits the World?: At my age I have to wonder how soon this country will implode and wither away into a vast nothingness, with the inefficient and country-killing Executive Order travesty he holds over all of our heads

The word “family” as we and others around the world know it, will soon disappear from the daily lexicon of human beings.

The family normally consists primarily of a female, who after giving birth is entitled to be the ‘mother’ and a male, who after creating a birth with his female partner in the marriage, is given the title of ‘father’. Just observing animals or insects, let alone humans, is enough education to understand why the word was conceived and the mating process, save for those convoluted participants, inevitably produced offspring enhancements of the couple’s personal genes, thereby creating the ‘family’.

Now that the miracle of birth has been voided by the “marriage” of two same sex providers, the new “partners”, because of their inherent deficiencies will have to depend on other more normal humans to provide the elements that create a family, no thanks to the five not only misguided but mentally deficient justices (I cringe when calling them by that misnomer) who stepped far out of character and bounds with their choice of vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; gaykkk; homosexualagenda; libertarians; marriage; medicalmarijuana; obamacare; supremecourt; zerocare

1 posted on 07/12/2015 6:59:09 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

They aren’t doing anything Un-American that an American President put them where they are to do what he wanted them to do in the first place.

WHO we allow to get the Republican party nomination matters more than we can know given the hoopla surrounding the transient and twisted, obfuscating campaigns they run according to a liberal media news cycle. They MATTER - immensely.

These candidates have definite keywords and trigger phrases that usually amount to cooperation, appeasement and settling for the second least evil. Anyone considering voting for another Bush should remember this.


2 posted on 07/12/2015 7:05:26 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

We do not have to obey them.

Really.

Where is that written?


3 posted on 07/12/2015 7:35:12 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

When laws are made, consequences come with them. Break those laws and suffer those consequences, what ever they may be.

Although I agree, we need to pick and choose which laws we want to obey.


4 posted on 07/12/2015 7:41:08 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

those three women there is why diversity is a farce.

Always was, always will be


5 posted on 07/12/2015 1:24:33 PM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Your point is well taken, but what president nominates who doesn’t seem to matter that much unless it is a democrat president, in which case the nominee will invariably be liberal. Reagan nominated O’Connor and Kennedy. Kennedy was confirmed 97-0. Kennedy was the deciding vote in the majority for ‘gay marriage.’ I can’t imagine O’Connor voting any different. She was confirmed 99-0. But Bush II eventually got Alito in for O’Connor. He was confirmed 58-42.

Freegards


6 posted on 07/12/2015 6:15:04 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

Understand completely. The kinds of Justices like Scalia or Thomas are few and far between IMO; one sailed through and the other was publically lynched.

It is my belief that the ones most hard fought for (on the Conservative side) are the best and most dependable. As for Bush II, his record is pretty dismal with regard to appointments, surely. I think he only had one thing on his mind the entire 8 years.


7 posted on 07/13/2015 2:20:25 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson