Posted on 06/16/2015 4:34:23 PM PDT by rightistight
A new feminist organization calling itself "Stop Patriarchy" has vowed to destroy "Christian fascist woman-haters," as well as other things it claims oppress women, including Churches and the United States military.
Writing on their website, StopPatriarchy.org, the group explains that their goal is to "FIGHT to STOP the enslavement of women." The way to do that, according to the feminist group, is to fight against and destroy oppressors.
"Christian fascist woman-haters are violently hacking away at abortion rights and even birth control, slamming women backwards," they explain.
Running from June 15 until June 19, the group is running a campaign in which its members will protest the "War on Women," which they claim is escalating. Stop Patriarchy is pleading with its members on Tumblr to get a large piece of cardboard, draw a chalk outline on it in the shape of a body, then put "bootprints" on it naming things that oppress women and need to e destoryed.
On their official Tumblr page, the group includes a video in which the US Military and Churches are named as forces of oppression:
(Excerpt) Read more at thesocialmemo.org ...
Clearly these people are unaware that our entirely military is now comprised of gay and gay friendly women and gays.
Brilliant!
I hate liberals, regardless of gender. I hate them for being selfish and their conceitedness and self-importance, god-complex, rules for you and not for me, you will be forced to live the way we demand and government will fine and jail you otherwise, communist statist the state is god, way of life.
You must live by my liberal values and we will not let you live by your Christian values or your conscience. We will force compliance at confiscation and jailing you. Government can nevr get too big, but watch out if your wallet does.
I abhor people like this. They are micromanaging big brothers. These are the people the world would be much much better off without.
In america women are a more than eaual, special, protected class with more rights than men.
I cant stand to hear the lying bullsh1t these people spew out.
I was referring to men who hate women in general. Of course we know what kind of “men” they tend to be. Hint: most would support Hillary and/or Obama with open arms.
Same Bullstalin, different day. Insider tale from the founding of NOW.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3200158/posts
Marxist Feminisms Ruined Lives
Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Mallory Millett
When women go wrong men go right after them. Mae West
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, Why? She answered, That means youll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!
What a giggle we girls had over that. How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are, we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, Come to New York. Were making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.
I hadnt seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, Sexual Politics.
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a consciousness-raising-group, a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
Why are we here today? she asked.
To make revolution, they answered.
What kind of revolution? she replied.
The Cultural Revolution, they chanted.
And how do we make Cultural Revolution? she demanded.
By destroying the American family! they answered.
How do we destroy the family? she came back.
By destroying the American Patriarch, they cried exuberantly.
And how do we destroy the American Patriarch? she replied.
By taking away his power!
How do we do that?
By destroying monogamy! they shouted.
How can we destroy monogamy?
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality! they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with The Revolution: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.
To me, this sounded silly. I was enduring culture shock after having been cut-off from my homeland, living in Third-World countries for years with not one trip back to the United States. I was one of those people who, upon returning to American soil, fell out of the plane blubbering with ecstasy at being home in the USA. I knelt on the ground covering it with kisses. I had learned just exactly how delicious was the land of my birth and didnt care what anyone thought because they just hadnt seen what I had or been where I had been. I had seen factory workers and sex-slaves chained to walls.
How could they know? Asia is beyond our ken and, as they say, utterly inscrutable, and a kind of hell I never intended to revisit. I lived there, not junketed, not visited like sweet little tourists Id conducted households and tried to raise a child. I had outgrown the communism of my university days and was clumsily groping my way back to God.
How could twelve American women who were the most respectable types imaginable clean and privileged graduates of esteemed institutions: Columbia, Radcliffe, Smith, Wellesley, Vassar; the uncle of one was Secretary of War under Franklin Roosevelt plot such a thing? Most had advanced degrees and appeared cogent, bright, reasonable and good. How did these people rationally believe they could succeed with such vicious grandiosity? And why?
I dismissed it as academic-lounge air-castle-building. I continued with my new life in New York while my sister became famous publishing her books, featured on the cover of Time Magazine. Time called her the Karl Marx of the Womens Movement. This was because her book laid out a course in Marxism 101 for women. Her thesis: The family is a den of slavery with the man as the Bourgeoisie and the woman and children as the Proletariat. The only hope for womens liberation (communisms favorite word for leading minions into inextricable slavery; liberation, and much like collective please run from it, run for your life) was this new Womens Movement. Her books captivated the academic classes and soon Womens Studies courses were installed in colleges in a steady wave across the nation with Kate Millett books as required reading.
Imagine this: a girl of seventeen or eighteen at the kitchen table with Mom studying the syllabus for her first year of college and theres a class called Womens Studies. Hmmm, this could be interesting, says Mom. Maybe you could get something out of this....
Bkmrk.
Every day tens of thousands of future women around the world are killed in the womb. You think they would accept this fact as a form of oppression?
Women have been running the country for nearly 100 years.
Sounds like they need a fluid gender dialogue or something.
Gotta see these babes to confirm Limbaugh’s undeniable truth #24 - Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women access to
the mainstream of society.
They are worried more about abortion than Islam enslaving women. That just goes to show you that they have no idea where the real threat lies.
And conservative women don’t hate men. In fact, we actually like (most) men.
“He-man Women Haters Club”.
Hypocrisy thy name is liberal!
I hate fascist women.
Reminds me of Calvin’s GROSS club (Get Rid Of Slimey girlS)and on the same approximate intellectual level.
Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another.
― H.L. Mencken
First, who are these fascist, Christian, woman-haters? Can I join them?
Kidding. I don’t hate women, but I despise feminism in all forms. Men and women are not the same, they aren’t interchangeable, and while they are equal, they have separate roles. This fact only ever causes liberal brain explosions.
Boom.
See? I rest my case. Haha
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.