I already told you I didn't agree with that assessment of her at this point. I'll reiterate this one more time, we've a long way to go, things are going to change.
And asking you a question is not going ad hominum, you do seem to have a hard for some reason as you go thread to thread with the same talking points.
As for me being defensive of her, I'm trying to be reasonable until I see something that is a game changer for her, right now she is slapping the crap out of "career politicians" and especially Hillary and the left.....I like that a lot, you?
Your “question” was ad hominum (and not original). It does not look good for you to deny it or play innocent after such an unfair and intellectually dishonest attack/evasion.
I appreciate what she is saying, and especially appreciate that she now is a lot more outspoken on pro-life matters.
She is talented and smart.
As a Californian I think that she ought to have run this time for Boxer’s seat.
That she isn’t, but moved to DC to become enmeshed in RNC national politics is indicative that she is not a serious candidate.
iCarly is a pseudo-candidate meant to support the RNC and act as buffer against any conservative insurgency. she is not the only one.
There is nothing wrong with that, especially if one supports the RNC establishment over conservatives.