Posted on 05/26/2015 10:11:42 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
When Chief Justice John Roberts fractured the Constitution and prostituted his own integrity by rewriting the individual mandate in order to find the Affordable Care Act constitutional, it understandably drew both public and media attention away from the Supreme Courts 7-2 decision that, although the Obama Administrations Medicaid expansion plans were constitutional, the federal government would NOT be permitted to withhold Medicaid funding from states which refused to implement the expansion. In short, the Obama Regime is not allowed to extort state compliance with its massive increase in Medicaid outlays by refusing to pay the Medicaid funds legitimately owed each state by the federal government.
The decision was quite clear and well represented as two of the Courts left-wing members even joined the majority. Only Ginsberg and Sotomayor decided that the federal government had the right to use extortion to force the participation of unwilling states in Obamas racket of providing taxpayer funded insurance (Medicaid) to young, healthy individuals.
And what is the purposethe real purpose, that isbehind ObamaCares expansion of Medicaid? Why is Barack so intent upon forcing states to provide countless billions in free, federally provided healthcare benefits to young, able bodied individuals? Well, why do power hungry, Marxist demagogues elected to public office in the United States promote anything? Theyre hoping to create yet another generation of American voters both beholding to and dependent on Big Brother.
In 2012, the Urban Institute
estimated that the expansion of Medicaid would cost the State of Florida 82 billion dollars over the...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Our reps here in Florida held out and refused to capitulate, forcing the governor to go beg the regime for the money. This is a perfect example of government by tyrannical fiat.
And there are FReepers here today who refuse to believe he was blackmailed...
Obamaocare Bullsh*t Extortion Nanny State PING!
PING!
That’ll teach him to adopt Irish kids via South America.
Why should Hussein obey any Court? What enforcement capability has the Court? Is not enforcement of a court’s decision in the hands of Hussein’s DoJ? Hussein has already established by unchallenged precedent that his DoJ can enforce things selectively. DoJ only has to enforce what the President wants it to enforce. The courts command no troops.
Just an aside, but in that decision, it stated that the entire practice of the Federal Government withholding funds to force states to comply with their “wishes” was UNCONSTITUTIONAL. If implemented, this would mean that states could set the drinking age back to 18 without losing their Federal Highway funding.
I believe!
Accusations that he was blackmailed seemed conspiracy theory back then, but now that we know Sheryl Atkinson’s computer was infected with malware, the executive branch spied on the Senate, that dossiers of political officials exist under NSA spying, that we spied on international world leaders - the idea that the head of the supreme court had a file with incriminating information used to switch his vote is no longer far fetched.
Bookmark
I was accused of having an aluminum helmet back then, too - until all the data started leaking out by way of diligent FReepers and others around the blogosphere that confirmed what I knew intuitively was right.
FR today, FR tomorrow, FR for as long as I’mn welcome here.
Thanks! and bttt
This could be his Wiki entry:
John Roberts fractured the Constitution and prostituted his own integrity by rewriting the individual mandate in order to find the Affordable Care Act constitutional
BTTT for #8
Even though we know it now...won’t they be able to do it to him again?
I actually considered it a conspiracy theory then. Now it seems the likely reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.