Posted on 04/27/2015 3:52:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Via Breitbart, a reminder that Britains left remains a few steps ahead of Americas in legally sanctioning thoughtcrime. Here in the good ol free-market U.S.A., we still prefer economic sanctions for deviating from ruling-class orthodoxy. But give us time. As a much older nation, the UKs had longer to make progress.
Theres a parliamentary election set for 10 days for now so Milibands speaking here with an eye to that. I wonder which group hes hoping to goose into turning out with these remarks devout Muslims or Britains Social Justice Warriors? Frankly, apart from womens issues and gay rights, theres probably not much difference between those constituencies anymore.
We are going to make [Islamophobia] an aggravated crime. We are going to make sure it is marked on peoples records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime, Miliband told the Editor of The Muslim News, Ahmed J Versi in a wide ranging exclusive interview.
We are going to change the law on this so we make it absolutely clear of our abhorrence of hate crime and Islamophobia. It will be the first time that the police will record Islamophobic attacks right across the country, he said
Throughout his interview, Miliband insisted that he took extreme care in what he said but it still did not stop him in using the generic term of Islamist terrorism and inferring the cause was religious rather than political when suggesting more than once it was based on perverted ideology.
When I read the phrase Islamophobic attacks, I thought he was describing sentencing enhancements for anti-Muslim hate crimes, not criminalizing hate itself. Multiple U.S. states will punish you more severely if you commit a crime against someone due to prejudice against their race or religion, but they dont make prejudice itself criminally actionable. If thats what Miliband means, hes merely bringing the UK into line with American law. But no, it turns out, hes going much further than that. What hes proposing is amending the UKs Racial and Religious Hatred Act of 2006, which already makes it a crime (punishable by up to seven years in prison!) to incite hatred against someone on racial and religious grounds, in order to increase the penalties even further. By Islamophobic attacks, he presumably means rhetorical attacks, not actual assault. Ask yourself: If youre already facing seven years in the pen for inciting hatred, how much less likely are you to engage in incitement if the penalty is boosted to, say, 15 years? The marginal deterrence in increasing the punishment here is near zero, but then thats not really what a pander like this is aimed at. This is Milibands way of showing core Labour voting blocs that hes on their side, whether or not his proposal will really do anything for them. Who knows? If Labour falls short of a parliamentary majority again because Muslims and leftists didnt turn out, maybe hell propose making Islamophobia punishable by life in prison to really get their attention. Whats a few political prisoners if it means restoring Labour to power?
As I say, in the U.S. our elites prefer to punish throughtcrimes like Islamophobia with boycotts, even if it means taking a dump on the graves of people braver than they are:
The decision by PEN American Center to give its annual Freedom of Expression Courage award to the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo has prompted six writers to withdraw as literary hosts at the groups annual gala on May 5, adding a new twist to the continuing debate over the publications status as a martyr for free speech
In an essay for The New Yorkers website after the attack, [Teju] Cole noted that the magazine claimed to offend all parties, but in fact in recent years has gone specifically for racist and Islamophobic provocations.
What I question is what PEN is hoping to convey by awarding a magazine that has become famous both for the horrible murder of staff members by Muslim extremists and for its denigrating portrayals of Muslims, [Deborah Eisenberg] said.
Surely these people realize that Charlie Hebdo is a left-wing satirical magazine. Presumably they know that its murdered editor, Stephane Charbonnier, just had a book published posthumously defending French Muslims as scapegoats for the countrys economic problems. The magazine goofed on Mohammed not because they have some special quarrel with Islam but because they couldnt abide being told that was forbidden in a country that claims to protect free speech. If Cole and Eisenberg still have a problem with the magazine after all that, its not because they question Charlies motives, its because they think satire involving Muslims is impermissible even when those motives are pure. Said Salman Rushdie in response, If PEN as a free speech organization cant defend and celebrate people who have been murdered for drawing pictures, then frankly the organization is not worth the name.
Via the Free Beacon, heres former satirical all-star Garry Trudeau claiming that it was Charlie Hebdo, not two jihadis with machine guns, who brought a world of pain to France and noting carefully that hed never draw an image of the prophet himself. Were not where Miliband is yet, but well get there. Bank on it.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
are you personally trying to give me a nervous breakdown or aneurysm tonight? :)
have Europe and America gone insane!!!!
Yes.
Great strategy as Islam swallows Great Britain whole. They are like a bullfrog in slowly boiling water
Help! Help! I’m afraid of Muslims. Don’t arrest me, bro!
Oddly enough,, Miliband is of Jewish Heritage!!
what a shock!
We are going to make [Islamophobia] an aggravated crime. We are going to make sure it is marked on peoples records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime, Miliband told the Editor of The Muslim News, Ahmed J Versi in a wide ranging exclusive interview.”
We are going to change the law on this so we make it absolutely clear of our abhorrence of hate crime and Islamophobia. It will be the first time that the police will record Islamophobic attacks right across the country,
......and we think OUR libs are idiots....SHEESH!
Realityphobia is the problem.
This is getting frickin’ insane!
Then I want aggravated hate crime for Conservaphobia.
Short answer: yup, insane.
Oh the irony.
Their religion is a hate crime....demonstrably so.
Seen anyone come back from getting their head sawed off to tell of their experience?
suicide!!!
Ed Miliband Jewish slur candidate suspended by Conservative
A Conservative local election candidate who said she could never support “the Jew” Ed Miliband has been suspended.
Gulzabeen Afsar, a council candidate in Derby, made the comment on Facebook.
In a post, she said: “Just can’t take Mr Ed Miliband seriously!” and later said: “Never ever will I drop that low and support the Al Yahud!”. Al Yahud is Arabic for “the Jew”.
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2015-england-32482560
aint the brave new whirrled wonderful
if he wants to kill himself, let him pull out a gun, why is he taking down the children?
Does this law apply to all religion or just islam, because the Left would regularly break Christianphobic hate crimes law
The Pen Maybe Mightier than the Sword.
But the Sword is Mightier than the Hand that Wields the Pen....
Islam is a scary religion. What is there not to be frightened of? Ask people in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya.
SO as we long suspected, the UK has its very-own Enemy-Within.
THe same crowd that sold out Great Britain to the IslamoNazis in the first place.
never thought the Brits would stand for this treason, but then again so have the French, Germans, Italians, and Americans....among others.
we are such stupid sheeple, it seems that the ruling elite can cram any sort of krap right down our throats and all we do is re-elect them....
I’m going to make “Milibrand” illegal. So there. Marxist putz and traitor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.