Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen

I’m aware that they had worked out the idea of firestorms. Where would you have them bomb when the targets are contained in a city? Just say “Oh well, can’t attack there, might kill a civilian.” Foolish ideas in total war.


126 posted on 02/16/2015 7:35:05 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: xone

Common sense: military fighting units first, the first being air forces.

Air supremecy, then ground war. Common sense.

Imagine the havoc rained down on ground forces after air supremecy.

The big problem for the elites and their minions at the top of UK/US governments:

Not enough dead, not enough property destruction prior to surrender, and most of the dead would be military.

No need for a United Nations, because there would be no fear of “total war”.

No financing of the rebuilding of flattened cities after the war. Bankers lose business on the back end.


128 posted on 02/16/2015 10:00:36 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson