CRUZ or lose.
Posted on 02/06/2015 4:18:40 PM PST by Reverend Saltine
One of the reasons that Romney lost is that he failed to take on the media. The ultimate lost opportunity came when CNN’s debate moderator Candy Crowley directly inserted herself into the argument between Obama and Romney to declare her favorite right and Romney wrong.
Romney had won the Republican primaries, but had failed to absorb the lesson of his most tenacious opponent. Newt Gingrich did not treat the media as a neutral moderator, but as a debate opponent, challenging its premises and agendas. And so Romney was left unprepared for Crowley’s attack.
On the road to 2016, the latest crop of candidates appears to have learned nothing from Romney’s failure. In response to the media blowing up his vaccine comment, Christie issued a sensible clarification that provided more fuel for the media narrative. And the media narrative is what most people know.
They know that Christie was behind Bridgegate even though the Democrats pushing the story provided zero evidence of it. They know that Congressman Steve Scalise spoke at a Neo-Nazi event even though that never actually happened. But what they know is the story that the media tells them. Not the facts.
The media is using Christie to churn out stories framing the GOP race as a debate over vaccines while painting Republicans as opponents of vaccination. Media attacks on Republicans come in three stages. The first stage reports on an individual Republican’s action or statement. The second stage projects that on Republicans in general as part of a “Culture of X.” The third stage asks whether Republicans will ever be able to break free of the “Culture of X” with “X” being anything from racism to hatred of science.
By now we’re in the third stage. Republican opposition to vaccination has become a media meme.
In response, conservative blogs and outlets have shown that Obama and Hillary Clinton both linked vaccines to autism and that parents who don’t vaccinate tend to be wealthy Democrats.
But the media won’t report that unless the actual candidates stop debating vaccines and start using those facts to challenge its lies and hypocrisy.
A media smear campaign can’t be met with sensible clarifications. They only strengthen the smear. Christie’s clarification that he believes in measles vaccinations has allowed the media to begin spinning him as flip-flopping on vaccines. Any further statements explaining his views will be used to continue reporting on the manufactured story of the “Republican vaccine controversy.”
The only way to break the cycle is for Republicans to stop explaining themselves and to challenge the narrative. The narrative is a lie, but no one will ever know that if the candidates don’t challenge it.
Sensible clarifications might have worked in 1955. They might have even worked in 1985. But they’re completely useless today. No doubt the fact that Obama and Hillary were vaccine skeptics will be acknowledged somewhere near the bottom of a Washington Post fact check of a Hillary commercial that blames her opponent for spreading disease and killing children. Maybe as many as five people will read it.
Today’s media has less respect for the truth than an elevator full of con artists. As bad as it is most of the time, it gets worse during national campaigns when it begins manufacturing scandals and then reporting on them and then demanding that the candidates respond to its narratives as if they were real issues.
And Republicans keep falling for it
The road to the White House is over the crushed and mangled narratives of the media. A Republican candidate who fails to take on the media will fall wrapped head to toe in lies and scandals. He will go on issuing clarifications and sensible statements while the media accuses him of murdering small children.
The media is not impartial. It is not even a forum. The national media is the political opponent of every Republican running for the White House.
It needs to be treated that way.
When CNN’s John King tried to drag Newt Gingrich through the dirt in a primary debate, Gingrich dragged the media through the dirt instead, describing it as “destructive”, “vicious” and “negative”. He turned the tables by putting the media and its motives up on the stage. He refused to treat John King as a journalist who had the right to hold him accountable. Instead he fought to hold King accountable.
And that’s something that any Republican candidate can do.
The public doesn’t like the media. Poll after poll shows that they don’t trust the media. They listen to what the media tells them because Republicans meekly play out their parts in the media’s smear campaigns the way that ISIS hostages do what they’re told even while their heads are being cut off.
When the media attacks, the issue should never be the credibility of a Republican candidate. The issue must always be the credibility of the media. It must be the credibility of the politicians being protected by the press. If Christie and Paul had based all of their replies around the fact that their positions are basically the same as those of Obama and Hillary, the media’s entire story would have collapsed.
The media would have been unable to move forward with the story without quoting the candidates, relegating the whole thing to the backwaters of the left in places like Salon and Slate. Instead the story is everywhere. And the only people who can kill it are the Republican targets of the smear campaign.
Conservative media outlets do their part, but they need Republicans to do theirs. The media buried Romney’s dog story when Republicans tepidly picked on the conservative media’s response that Obama had eaten dog. But when Republicans sit and take it, then they become the victims of the media.
The media counts on Republicans playing defense. When Republicans go on the attack, when they challenge premises and the moral authority of the press, then phony scandals suddenly fizzle out.
Republicans wouldn’t roll over and play dead for their opponents. Why do they do it for the media?
Obama understood that being able to control your message and your brand is the most important element of modern politics. He shut out the media by using a small clique of influential friendly journalists for heavy interviews while doing light chats with everyone from YouTube celebrities to late night talk show hosts. He has his own photographer who distributes photos for the press to use.
When there’s a controversy, the White House leaks an anonymous response. Its spokesmen divert and delay. They make fools of themselves to protect Obama. Their main goal is to deny the press a useable quote and they accomplish their real purpose of making the press briefings a waste of the press’ time.
If Obama distrusts and shuts out the press even though it licks his boots, why do Republicans play ball with it only to get a kick in the teeth?
The media was Obama’s messaging machine. It is becoming Hillary’s spin system. If Republicans passively submit to it, then the media will define them and 2016 will become a rerun of 2012.
2016 won’t just be a race against Hillary, but against the media. The media needs Republicans to tie the noose around their own necks by acknowledging the media’s credibility as investigators and reporters.
When Republicans provide the media with credibility, they lose.
Well, you’re wrong.
They get all their money from the advertising cost of consumer spending. All welfare, and most other government spending, is a government subsidy of consumer spending.
IE: it’s money in their pockets.
Democrats advance government spending.
Now a wise man once said he can tell where a man got his opinions by where that man got his ‘money’.
And he was right. You should heed Mark Twain.
That was awesome. Thanks for posting!
Nope, they’re Dem partisans because Dem policies make them the most money.
The USA is confronted by three enemies:
1. Islamic terrorists
2. The radical left
3. The Mainstream Media
And, of the three, the most dangerous is the Media. Because, without the Media's support, the other two enemies would've been defeated a decade ago.
Excellent piece
The problem with your argument is that it applies to everything. Virtually everyone gets money from consumer spending, one way or another. Yes, government subsidies encourage consumer spending in some ways, and discourage it in others. Because govenment tends to be quite wasteful, there would likely be more consumer spending with smaller government, not less.
Much of the old media is failing, not getting enough money to survive, because they put agenda over money. CNN and MSNBC could put on conservatives, and gain audience, but the will not, because it does not promote the agenda.
Money is far from the most potent motivator, especially once survival is ensured.
Ted Cruz is a once in a generation, perhaps lifetime, political superstar. We are so fortunate that he has come along now at this time in history.
I don’t understand the point of your “applies to everything” criticism. Why must it only apply to the media to be true [and it definitely doesn’t apply to investment or savings]?
And yes, temporarily, everyone benefits from consumer spending- until the debt has to be paid!
Media, like most corporations, looks only to the next quarter, or maybe year.
Government subsidies of investment- which media doesn’t benefit from- are typically Republican policies.
Government subsidies of spending- which media does benefit from- are typically Dem policies.
Government subsidies of spending: entitlements, will soon take all government revenue. The media is profiting greatly from it’s support of Dems.
The 7+ trillion of debt under Obama has gone mostly to consumer spending, so he’s been good for over a half-trillion of dollars for media.
TV shows are for advertisers, advertisers don't want hard-headed, tight-fisted conservative viewers LOL! They want 'dumb sluts' who'll part with their money as unquestioningly as possible: Dems.
Not as simplistic as it sounds...
Bookmark.
The media play Juan like a Stradivarius - and he has no clue that to them he’s just a useful idiot.
Cruz definitely.
Paul possibly, but I’m not into Libertarians.
It would be worth a Cruz candidacy just to watch him tie the media into knots. And you KNOW he would.
you do NOT have my permission to add me to ANY list.
DON’T do it.
We agree on something! :)
Excellent article-A Must-Read for any candidate running against a Democrat.
Thanks for posting Greenfield!
You are very welcome, humblegunner, as are all readers; SOMEbody has to get Greenfield out in front of as many people as possible. He is one of the very best and most articulate analysts/writers out there. Glad you’re already a Fan of Dan, as am I.
You are areal jerk. Louis has been faithfully bringing us Daniel Greenfield’s blogs and stories and now he offers you a favor so that The Sultan’s stories are not double posted and you get nasty. The FR ping list to Daniel Greenfield is established. Deal with it.
You speak in tongues? You do sound snippity, Snippy.
So you’ve read the private e-mails “Louis” has sent me?
You call me a name?
Show me your badges.
You need badges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.