More Climate Political Science?
“Orion Jones”?
no
No. Next question.
No, but future generations will be sucking hard on the federal deficit left for them.
... or will future generations shake their head that the second Dark Age of superstition, lies, economic collapse, tyranny, etc., was brought on by an obvious political hoax masquerading as “science”.
Yeah....we closed all the coal power and nuclear power stations and in the upcoming global cooling billions died.
We have successfully enslaved them in perpetual debt for which they will receive no benefit, do you think they will even care?
I wrote a science fiction book, too. It’s titled A LISTINGS OF IDIOTS IN 2014. It’s the Harvard Faculty Directory.
No, they’ll roar with laughter we ever fell for this in the first place.
ahaha Future generations will laugh themselves silly...thinking how vainly stupid these warmers were
Man this group think nonsense is getting tiresome.
So transparent.
As the circle of believers begin to shrink (exponentially) you can find yourself “spouting consensus nonsense” when consensus is lost.
This is where we are now.
No way to explain that to your contemporaries or your family after that.
Sad.
But the farming in Antartica became amazing!
First, Barack the Dork.
Now, Naomi the nincompoop.
Harvard is rapidly becoming a joke.
personally I think our future generations will look back at the damage the lunatic gaia worshipers did and their ridiculous fear mongering and wonder how the rational people let them get away with as much as they did.
Phrenology had the same sort of widely touted “scientific consensus” two hundred years ago that Global Warming does today, the same sneering certainties on the part of the unqualified, the same rush of enthusiasm, the same celebrity practitioners. I do not think history will be any kinder to the AGW crowd than it has been to people who thought they could tell your character from the bumps on your head.
It’s called Global Warming Nye ,stop changing the name
I found myself confronting a stranger’s random presumptuousness re: AGW. I matched snottiness with snottiness, but that just isn’t me. No profit in it.I should have said, “I have good news and bad news. First, the bad news: China is stamping out new coal-fired power plants like cookies, and India isn’t far behind. So even if you win politically in America, you are not going to save the world from CO2.
The good news is that the AGW vindicates Eisenhower’s warning about the possibility of politicization of science and the military-industrial complex. AGW is a hoax, so the Earth doesn’t need you to save it from CO2.
They will be too busy clawing at the doors of neighbors demanding they turn over their guests so they can have their way with them.