Posted on 09/24/2014 7:55:32 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Because we're not relying on air power for anything, right?
Not that we really expect rational thinking from the Obama White House, but youd think President Air Power Only would put a high premium on the procurement of fighter jets, yes? Youd think that, but according to one of the leading manufacturers of said fighter jets, youd be wrong. Boeing tells Fox News it doesnt expect to be making many fighter jets - perhaps not any - in the near future:
The shift comes despite the Navys ongoing use of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet to strike Islamic militants in Iraq and the companys ongoing lobbying campaign to persuade U.S. lawmakers to preserve funding for the fighter planes, both of which are built at its St. Louis plant.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Boeing: U.S. to stop ordering fighter jets in near future
until they realize , you have to have them and then the cost will go Shy High
We could always buy them from the Brits or the Japanese. Japan has recently eased their strict export rules on military equipment and might even loan us the money to buy them. < / sarcasm >
De-pimped - heres the entire article:
Not that we really expect rational thinking from the Obama White House, but youd think President Air Power Only would put a high premium on the procurement of fighter jets, yes? Youd think that, but according to one of the leading manufacturers of said fighter jets, youd be wrong. Boeing tells Fox News it doesnt expect to be making many fighter jets - perhaps not any - in the near future:
The shift comes despite the Navys ongoing use of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet to strike Islamic militants in Iraq and the companys ongoing lobbying campaign to persuade U.S. lawmakers to preserve funding for the fighter planes, both of which are built at its St. Louis plant.
Earlier this year at the Navy Leagues annual conference outside Washington, D.C., Boeing touted the effectiveness of its fourth-generation EA-18G electronic attack plane over Lockheed Martin Corp.s F-35 stealth fighter. In presentations and advertisements, the company argued the Growler is more equipped than the Joint Strike Fighter for operating in areas with sophisticated enemy air defenses, known in military parlance as anti-access, area-denial, or A2-AD, environments.
Stealth is perishable; only a Growler provides full spectrum protection, stated a slide in a briefing given by Mike Gibbons, vice president of F/A-18 and EA-18G programs for Boeing, in a not-so-subtle dig at the radar-evading, fifth-generation jet made by Lockheed.
Boeing pressed lawmakers to add funding for 22 additional Growlers in the Defense Departments fiscal 2015 budget, which begins Oct. 1, citing analysis that shows the need for a total of 50 or 100 more EA-18Gs to meet joint and coalition requirements.
The Pentagons budget request didnt include any funding for the EA-18G, a derivative of the F/A-18. Whats more, it proposed retiring 51 F-15C Eagles, almost half of which are in Europe, due in part to automatic budget cuts known as sequestration.
Blaming sequestration for decisions like this is utter nonsense
Blaming sequestration for decisions like this is utter nonsense. The Pentagon is not eliminating fighter jets because of sequestration, which is merely a tiny reduction in the increase in federal spending - a reduction that doesnt force the administration to apply it in any particular way. This Obama Administration simply doesnt regard effective weapons of war as a priority, which you probably find ironic considering that when they have no choice but to intervene in a situation abroad (like, say, now), they are determined to do the fighting without American boots on the ground.
But thats governing in the age of Obama, isnt it? Its always a matter of flying by the seat of your pants - establishing the broader strategies based on your political needs of the moment, then doing whatever dance you need to when your strategy doesnt comport to reality.
I recently reported and wrote a story for Detroits Business Magazine (not yet published so I cant give you a link) that looks at this as a bigger trend on the ground as well. Defense contractors and others in the industry tell me the direction of this administration is to pull way back on manufacturing new defense vehicles and to focus instead on refurbishing and retrofitting vehicles that have been in action, in some cases, for many decades.
This type of thinking is always based on the Obama fantasy that the U.S. can pull back from the world - can stand down as other countries stand up or some such nonsense - and that we arent going to need those new vehicles and planes. We allow ourselves to rest comfortably in this thinking until a threat like ISIS, seeing Americas lack of resolve, runs wild and becomes such a huge problem that it needs to be confronted. Then the U.S. gets dragged kicking and screaming into the fight, but determines to do so only with planes, which we no longer make because hey, why would we need them?
I wonder if Americans will ever get it through their heads that we can never retreat from the world, and that we have to accept that and remain prepared - which includes spending the money to make the vehicles, planes and weapons systems that keep us ready to fight. I dont think Americans really want to accept that, which is why they constantly back politicians like Obama until reality forces them to deal with reality.
You realize, of course, that our enemies - the ones we know about and some we havent even heard of yet - are also following the news of our delusion. Better to care now than to wait until we have no choice.
This just in....”The congress is considering building one new fighter to replace all the unusable F-35s. It will cost 10 billion dollars, will not fly but will provide a massive income stream for representative districts all over the nation. Much of the technology involved will be taken from reverse engineered Yugos.” Jane’s “All the Worlds Aircraft” is expected to release a picture as soon as the Etch-a-Sketch prototype is finished.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.