Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Simon & Schuster imprint rejected book about Bergdahl because it might hurt Obama
Hot Air ^ | August 13, 2014 | Allahpundit

Posted on 08/13/2014 2:01:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Via the Daily Caller, you would think an eyewitness account of the disappearance of the last American POW in Afghanistan would be easy money for a publisher.

But sometimes there are higher considerations.

While the U.S. Army weighs whether to bring charges against Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was freed earlier this year after spending nearly five years as a Taliban captive in Afghanistan, six of his former platoon mates are shopping proposals for a book and movie that would render their own harsh verdicts…

“I’m not sure we can publish this book without the Right using it to their ends,” Sarah Durand, a senior editor at Atria Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, wrote in an email to one of the soldiers’ agents.

“[T]he Conservatives are all over Bergdahl and using it against Obama,” Durand wrote, “and my concern is that this book will have to become a kind of ‘Swift Boat Veterans for Truth’” — a reference to the group behind a controversial book that raised questions about John Kerry’s Vietnam War record in the midst of his 2004 presidential campaign. (Durand did not respond to requests for comment. “We do not comment about our editorial process,” said Paul Olsewski, vice president and director of publicity at Atria.)

That “Swift Boat” talking point comes straight from the White House itself. Imagine how upset Durand will be when she finds out Obama can’t be swiftboated because — sob — he can’t run again.

I trust that Michael Isikoff wouldn’t have run with this if he wasn’t confident that it’s true (he has some experience with publishers spiking stories that are unhelpful to Democratic presidents, as I recall), but it seems odd that Durand would have laid out her political motives so nakedly in an e-mail to one of the soldiers’ agents. Why do that knowing that it might leak and force Atria to explain precisely how damaging to Barack Obama a book can be before it’s unfit for publication? That’s something you’d say inside an office at Simon & Schuster while sticking pins in a Ted Cruz doll, not something you’d put down in print and then hand over to someone whose book you’re rejecting.

Here’s the “about” page for Atria Books, by the way, which begins by emphasizing the vision of its publisher. Any guesses as to which presidential candidate she favored in the last two elections? Do a search at Open Secrets if you can’t stand the suspense.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Business/Economy; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; army; bergdahl; bobbergdahl; bowebergdahl; demagogicparty; gitmo; kenyanbornmuzzie; memebuilding; michaelisikoff; military; obama; pages; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; simonandschuster

1 posted on 08/13/2014 2:01:12 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

AS IF she would ever care about hurting a Conservative!! Blatantly transparent.


2 posted on 08/13/2014 2:06:25 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Simon and Schuster covering for Democrats? Who is shocked by that?


3 posted on 08/13/2014 2:08:02 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So take your work to another publisher! They don’t have a monopoly. Let them keep their prejudices.


4 posted on 08/13/2014 2:21:12 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

First of all, I didn’t know people still bought books but apparently they do.

Second, if this book was published just who does this nitwit think would buy it? Liberals? Liberals can’t read.


5 posted on 08/13/2014 2:21:23 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I trust that Michael Isikoff wouldn’t have run with this if he wasn’t confident that it’s true (he has some experience with publishers spiking stories that are unhelpful to Democratic presidents, as I recall)

True but he quickly fell into line and still invited to the cocktail parties and (liberal) talk shows.

6 posted on 08/13/2014 2:26:35 PM PDT by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Borderline censorship, IMHO.


7 posted on 08/13/2014 2:28:55 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Anything to keep the myth alive.


8 posted on 08/13/2014 3:36:19 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.

And meanwhile:

A World In Chaos, And Kerry’s Talking Climate Change
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3192981/posts


9 posted on 08/14/2014 9:02:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson