Posted on 08/06/2014 5:14:39 AM PDT by servo1969
Your wife at least knows how to give an unambiguous hint.
Just how drunk would a guy have to be....
LMAO!!
I’m sure she has never been “raped”.
She was so ugly, two guys broke into her apartment, she cried “Rape” and they both yelled, “NOOOOOOOOOO!”
-Rodney Dangerfield
If you take this at face value, all sexual acts perpetrated by men are rape. Including homosexual sex acts.
And to kill spiders.
Shhheeez. TMI. (Too Much Information) What’s with these people?
That, and it takes American feminism to turn one (or a few) men's abuse into a life-long hatred for 1/2 of the earth's population.
I actually DID hit that.
This seems to me to be a lot like the same reasoning of poor people hating rich people. I don’t have money therefore I hate those who do.
I ain’t gettin’ no PIV ergo must hate on those that do. I submit the photo of the author above as evidence.
Shades of both Orwell and Huxley. Neither of these authors would have seen the light of day had they tried to get published today, I would think.
At this point, Orwell’s a prophet. Huxley’s approaching that status.
As for this, thing, that wrote this screed. The political discourse from 1900 to 1960 was some of the most radical ever.
In 1970 through the 2000s, discourse became much more subdued, helped I think by the failure of the communist experiment.
Now that representative republic’s time in the petri dish is coming to a close, and the internet has lowered the bar to publishing your thoughts, public discourse is casting itself about, trying to figure out what works best and questioning everything.
I don’t think its a stretch to imagine a lot of women see nothing but downside to having to impose any sort of discipline that would be required to a) share their lives with a man, or b) be any sort of fit mother to another person completely dependent upon them.
This, thing, is just an extreme example of what we already understand as a group - some believe life owes them, that rules are for everyone else, and responsibility is something to which we hold others.
A lot of women’s experience with sex is negative. First time sex was painful, and then they got pregnant, and then he left. That a group of women would grow up and react like this one doesn’t require a leap of conception.
It’s not how you react to adversity, it’s how you respond to it. Here’s a textbook example of reaction to adversity.
pregnancy is not a disease
>>So, I’m guessing PIA and PIM are off the table<<
I’m I a horrible person because I lol ‘d at this
I guess I’m glad you explained what PIV is, because I didn’t understand, but then I honestly wish I hadn’t read this crap.
Seriously feminist psychos have done more to hurt women than men could ever do.
Why did Andrea Dworkin worry about it? She was obviously in no danger of intercourse!
EXCEPT of course if some state chose IWAD (Intercourse With Andrea Dworkin) as their form of the death penalty....but then, of course, that would be considered cruel and unusual.
She came up with the concept to explain her lack of coitus - and lacking such decided to hate men rather than do something about it.
How drunk were you??
You are legendary, I know... but, that would require a WHOLE BUNCH of margaritas for me to get in sniffing distance..
You can say that again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.