Love how scientists say it’s “impossible” because it violates “laws.”
Nothing unreal about physical laws.
And Chinese scientists? Why would they want to present something that works to NASA? Not that the NASA team has proven anything anyway (and the Chinese claim of 2.59 ounces force has not been independently verified by them, never mind their own alleged 0.00018 ounce force).
Reminds me of the scene in the original Planet of the Apes, where Taylor’s translator tells the court he flew there, and the court says “flight is a scientific impossibility!”. Taylor then sends a paper airplane flying across the room.
That would mean that 0bama is “impossible”.
Hey, these guys are messing with “settled science’”. Someone call Obama!
I always find it funny too.. Violated laws they know but I am sure their billion of laws yet to be discovered.
Actual scientists don’t use words like “impossible”.
>>Love how scientists say it’s “impossible” because it violates “laws.”<<
We’ve got a whole crowd of “impossible” chanters here on FR. Why haven’t they appeared yet?
If they really thought it was impossible they wouldn’t have tried it. Scientists are generally pretty straight up about there being things they’ve got a good handle on, things they don’t, and both sets are one discovery away from being rewritten.
Could it be applied to the Energy Industry? Or would the federal government move to consfiscate the engine for violating “laws” of physics and other obvious reasons?
Consensus has spoken! This thing cannot work! I don’t care if they build one and fly it to the stars, Consensus says it will not work, therefore it will not!
Bow to Consensus, lowly rube swine!
yup. nothing works until they say so.
our modern day “priests of the material universe and nothing more.”