Another left-wing mistress of hypocrisy is unhappy with the Supreme Court

Coach is Right ^ | 7/5/14 | Doug Book

[Oldpuppymax]

We have all seen the antics of a placard toting liberal as she tearfully protests the upcoming, state sponsored execution of a triple murderer. And when this same purple-haired progressive celebrates a new Planned Parenthood record in abortions performed, is anyone really surprised?

After all, liberalism couldn’t exist without these mind-numbing displays of shameless hypocrisy. Frantic challenges to the deserved execution of a merciless killer followed with squeals of delight at the death of some 334,000 infants during the 2011-2012 hunting seasons of America’s abortion titleholder–all in a day’s work for the compassionate left.

When the Supreme Court decided in the Hobby Lobby case that owners of a closely held corporation may not be forced to provide abortion drugs to employees contrary to their religious beliefs, New York Daily News contributor Linda Stasi couldn’t rest without providing a praiseworthy example of liberal hypocrisy.

Like other liberal females, Stasi is no doubt a strong, capable and self-sufficient woman who demands respect for America’s strong, capable and self-sufficient women. Yet 48 hours after the Court’s decision, Stasi claimed disaster awaited her female peers because they are too weak, inept and dependent upon a free, employer-provided abortion drug to avoid the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy.

Stasi laments the inevitable catastrophe awaiting women employed by...

[headstamp 2]

“New York Daily News contributor Linda Stasi”

You just can’t make this stuff up.

[MuttTheHoople]

Linda Stasi??? Why not call herself “Linda Gestapo”? “Linda Gulag”? “Linda ‘Death Heads Battalion’”?

[ConservingFreedom]

“…that takes away women’s rights to affordable contraception of their choice,

So unless ALL forms of contraception are FREE, rights have been violated? Witless leech.

while protecting men’s right to free erection drugs"

I doubt there's a plan in the country that makes ED drugs copay-less ... and any insurer is free under the law to cease covering them altogether. But why let facts stand in the way of a misanthropic rant?

[GeronL]

bump

[Morpheus2009]

I don’t know, and I am not an expert on drug prices all around. But don’t a lot of drugs cost more than either condoms or pills? I know that plenty of people have prescription medications costing 200 dollars or more if uninsured. The issues this woman brings up border on the rediculous.