I must admit that I am baffled by some of this. But, not being a lawyer, that may be expected, I guess.
Rather than passing laws and ordinances that identify things like vehicles as extension of the home, etc., would not it be better to apply, by force of law, the notion that protecting one’s person, or that of others, is taken regardless of place or circumstance? Exceptions, if any, could then be spelled out separately. That would call attention to the insidious creep of the left as they push to add more and more locations to the ‘exempted’ list.
Just sayin’
Yeah, but that would make sense. Can’t have that!
Cheers,
Jim