[randita]

Man holds knife to woman’s neck, turns on iPhone recorder. Demands that the woman states for the record that the sex is consensual. He concurs.

It’s on the record - who’s to say it was not rape?

[mountn man]

ManWOMAN holds knife to woman’sMAN'S neck, turns on iPhone recorder. Demands that the womanMAN states for the record that the sex is consensual. HeSHE concurs.

It’s on the record - who’s to say it was not rape?

The feminist prosecutor and all the liberals (this is Kalifornia) on the jury.

[Charles Martel]

Man holds knife to woman’s neck, turns on iPhone recorder. Demands that the woman states for the record that the sex is consensual. He concurs.

It’s on the record - who’s to say it was not rape?

Would a man whose real intent was to rape actually go through all that? Doubtful. It wouldn't surprise me, though, to see some sort of smartphone app developed that features disclaimer language and collates date, time and photos of the parties with digital images of concurrence signatures. Hell, it probably already exists.