Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

requesting help reading Korean War-era Air Force discharge papers
self | 11/5/13 | NewJerseyJoe

Posted on 11/05/2013 6:40:46 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe

Hello FRiends. I am going through my late father's papers from when he was in the Air Force (total of 17 years, active and reserve). I'd like to be able to decipher some of the acronyms and military terms used in duty assignments, etc. Does anyone know of a source online that would help me to decipher these things? Thank you.

Examples:
2267th PerPron (CONAC)
AFQT-1 I 98Mech 7 Cler 9 Tech 9


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: airforce; dischargepapers; koreanwar; usaf

1 posted on 11/05/2013 6:40:46 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

2267th PerPron (CONAC)
AFQT-1 I 98Mech 7 Cler 9 Tech 9
= = = = = = = = = = =
Not all that familiar with AF terminology etc

Not sure on CONAC but maybe you should ‘Google’ AIR FORCE terms or jargon or such. I want to think it is Continental Air Command or something along that line.

AFQT is the battery of tests one takes upon entering to determine what field one may go into.
Which, for some reason, will take someone who has been a Mechanic for 10 years and the tests say he would be an excellent AF Cook etc...


2 posted on 11/05/2013 6:46:03 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 --Too bad Abortion and birth control advocates didn't have parents who agreed with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

2267th Personnel Processing Squadron (Continental Air Command) Air Force Quotient Test level 1 (the highest) mechanical clerical technical

These are just my qualified guesses, no guarantee they are 100 pct correct.


3 posted on 11/05/2013 6:48:20 PM PST by Rider on the Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn; Rider on the Rain
Thank you, friends.

Those were two examples that jumped off the pages at me -- there are mny more! I suspect I will be working on this project for several months...

Thanks again, I do appreciate it greatly!

4 posted on 11/05/2013 6:51:32 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ping.


5 posted on 11/05/2013 6:58:04 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Thanks.


6 posted on 11/05/2013 6:59:43 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Do you have a Air Force Reserve or National Guard unit locally close to you? I would give them a call.


7 posted on 11/05/2013 7:10:33 PM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._Air_Force_acronyms_and_expressions

= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
That should get you started, I scanned through it and probably a lot of them are modern but there are plenty of Ref points at the bottom of the page....


8 posted on 11/05/2013 7:13:02 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 --Too bad Abortion and birth control advocates didn't have parents who agreed with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Although I’m more familiar with Army acronyms, some of this looks familiar.

The AFQT is the Armed Forces Qualification Test and is part of the military’s vocational aptitude tests. These battery of tests are designed to show what skills and/or aptitudes a person has that relate to the needs of the military. If I recall correctly, applicants have to score a minimum overall number in order to qualify for enlistment and the overall score varies somewhat among the various services.

I think your Dad was tested by the 2267th Personnel unit. CONAC probably refers to Continential United States Air Command or some such.

Looks like your Dad had high scores in clerical and technical skills and reasonably high mechanical aptitudes.
I surmise his scores put him in the highest or first category intelligence wise and that he scored a 98 overall.
I could be wrong but, as I said, I’m more familiar with Army terms that date back to the late 60s.

Hope this helps somewhat. What did your Dad do in the AF?

2267th PerPron (CONAC)
AFQT-1 I 98Mech 7 Cler 9 Tech 9


9 posted on 11/05/2013 7:14:42 PM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

The term you posted were dated. But, I think we can figure them out. Current AF here. Post some more and we can see what comes of it.

JJ


10 posted on 11/05/2013 7:17:14 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe; Jet Jaguar

I’m current Air Force Reserve - between me and Jet Jag, we can probably get most of it.


11 posted on 11/05/2013 7:56:53 PM PST by jagusafr (the American Trinity (Liberty, In G0D We Trust, E Pluribus Unum))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miele man

G’day

I believe the 2267th PerPron was an administrative unit based at Manhattan Air Force Station in the 1950’s that was responsible for processing personnel heading overseas to Europe and returning back to the U.S. It also processed those separating from the Air Force.

Cheers...Chris


12 posted on 11/05/2013 8:46:10 PM PST by Moose47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moose47; NewJerseyJoe

Thank you Moose47. NJJoe, this puts a little flesh on the bones of my earlier reply.


13 posted on 11/05/2013 10:22:25 PM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I’m really curious, your Dad served 17 years in the Air Force (combined active and reserve). Why did he stop at 17? Have you ever asked? If he would have done three more years, he would have qualified for a military pension at age 60, plus been eligible for tricare for life.


14 posted on 11/06/2013 5:06:36 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

That is today speak.

In the era he is mentioning, the pension started upon your retirement of 20 years. In effect you could have went in on your 17th birthday, retired with 20 and started drawing your pension at 37.
Also, the reenlistment bonus capped at $2000.00 for the ENTIRE enlistment. You would get a portion upon reenlisting but if you somehow had drawn the 2000 by your 12th year, the next reup would have brought you no ‘reenlistment bonus’.

That was that way into the mid-late 60’s....Plus when you got out - after 20, you were guaranteed medical for the rest of your life.

Tricare, Champus etc are fairly new and ‘THEY’ claimed we were never told that.. Guess the original version of trying to explain what is is.


15 posted on 11/06/2013 2:32:19 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 --Too bad Abortion and birth control advocates didn't have parents who agreed with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn
"In the era he is mentioning, the pension started upon your retirement of 20 years."

It does also today if you do 20 years active duty time. However, in the post he mentions that his Dad had 17 years of active duty and reserve time. That means he would collect his pension starting at age 60. It's been like that for many years. At least post WWII if not earlier. Tricare for Life/Champus was started sometime in the 50's so it has been around a while also.
16 posted on 11/07/2013 7:01:10 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Sorry, the ‘R’ part didn’t register with me.
I also don’t remember the retirees really griping about CHAMPUS and TRICARE till the mid 80’s.

Also thought they had changed the retirement to 60’s but maybe that was the change when they allowed them to retire after 15?? I do remember for awhile that when ‘they’ hit 18 or so years, they were starting to walk on eggs as getting ‘pushed out’ became popular.

Thanks...


17 posted on 11/07/2013 2:54:34 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 --Too bad Abortion and birth control advocates didn't have parents who agreed with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson