Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Paper Corroborates Svensmark's Theory of Cosmoclimatology
The Hockey Schtick ^ | March 21, 2013 | Unknown

Posted on 08/15/2013 1:36:41 AM PDT by Rocky

A paper published today in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics finds "strong evidence" of a link between thunderstorm and solar activity in Brazil from 1951-2009. According to the authors, thunderstorm "behavior with respect to the 11-year solar cycle suggest a global mechanism probably related to a solar magnetic shielding effect acting on galactic cosmic rays as an explanation for the relationship of thunderstorm and solar activity," which would corroborate Svensmark's theory of cosmoclimatology.

The relationship between thunderstorm and solar activity for Brazil from 1951 to 2009

Osmar Pinto Netoa, b, Corresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author, Iara R.C.A. Pintob, Osmar Pinto Jr.b

a Camilo Castelo Branco University (Unicastelo), São Jose dos Campos, Sao Paulo, 12247-004, Brazil b ELAT/CCST, National Institute of Space Research (INPE), São Jose dos Campos, Sao Paulo, 12227-010, Brazil

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.03.010

(Excerpt) Read more at hockeyschtick.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: globalwarming
Svensmark was written off by some scientists as a nut because of his theory.
1 posted on 08/15/2013 1:36:41 AM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rocky

A contrary opinion posted on Watts Up With That:

Mike Jonas says:
August 15, 2013 at 12:25 am

re: Another Paper Supports Svensmark’s Cosmic Ray Theory: I don’t think it does, other than by finding evidence of an 11-year cycle. When it says the cycles “ suggest a global mechanism probably related to a solar magnetic shielding effect acting on galactic cosmic rays as an explanation for the relationship of thunderstorm and solar activity” it has entered the realm of pure conjecture because AFAICS from the abstract the study itself did not investigate in any way the solar parameters or GCRs. To my mind, it is roughly equivalent to saying that the findings are “consistent with” GCR theory – and we all know how valuable (or not) such arguments can be.


2 posted on 08/15/2013 1:42:47 AM PDT by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Well if Mike Jonas says it, it must be true.

Who is Mike Jonas?


3 posted on 08/15/2013 3:55:13 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson