Posted on 06/29/2013 7:54:26 AM PDT by NOBO2012
Did I read this right?
“Obama is completely under water on the immigration issue – white voters disapprove of his job on the issue by 60-32, Independents disapprove by 59-32, and non-college educated disapprove by 56-36.”
That’s ridiculous; under water? Everyone knows that Big Guy practically walks on water.
And just who did they get there their numbers from any way – Sarah Palin? And speaking of Sarah, I hear she’s a little fired up over the direction the R-word leaders are taking. Did you read what she said?
And that’s not all:
Folks like me are barely hanging on to our enlistment papers in any political party – and it’s precisely because flip-flopping political actions like amnesty force us to ask how much more bull from both the elephants in the Republican Party and the jackasses in the Democrat Party we have to swallow before these political machines totally abandon the average commonsense hardworking American. Now we turn to watch the House. If they bless this new “bi-partisan” hyper-partisan devastating plan for amnesty, we’ll know that both private political parties have finally turned their backs on us.
It will then be time to show our parties’ hierarchies what we think of being members of either one of these out-of-touch, arrogant, and dysfunctional political machines.
(SNIP)
No wonder Sarah’s torqued off. It sounds like she feels like she’s been sold out by the wolves in the fold.
And as you know, wolves are a big problem in Alaska and need to be culled out in order to protect the innocents from their ravenous behavior.
(SNIP)
I don’t know about you, butt if it were up to me I’d probably go with the bears next time around. Grizzlies I think.
Sure, they can be cute:
butt when they get their hair up -
and decide to get in your kitchen (h/t: Dennis Miller) -
you might want to pack up and get out of town.
(SNIP)
“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
Why not post it all here instead of pimping for hits?
Nice.
Why?
There was a time when politicians who said one thing and then did the opposite would be treated to a new wardrobe: hot tar and feathers.
Hypothetically, of course, if we returned to that kind of activity, I would bet many politicians would return to representing those who elected them, rather than those providing funds to the politicians’ off-shore retirement funds.
Another hypothetical could be a Star Chamber type that reviews politicians’ actions and activities and resolves the situation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Chamber
I don’t mind giving you few hits now and then. MOTUS is entertaining. Unlike the Blog Nazis here.
Seconded.
Third.
Usually better quality than the blog posts that qualify as MSM articles these days.
Thirded
The “butt” schtick has gotten old. Suggest you drop it. It’s detracting from whatever points you’re trying to make in your articles.
You also need to spend some time interacting with Freepers who take the time to comment on your threads. You’re looking more and more like a classic blog pimp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.