Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist. Why would his opinion on matters such as this mean anything? There is no “evidence” for a lot of things in the world. Science is about exploring the unknown in an attempt to make it known. So when faced with a question such as this one, many theories are proposed which all work, until some new discovery or new data can refute those theories or add a little more to them.
That’s my point. The scientific community will claim God doesn’t exist for lack of evidence, then declare that there are a zillion universes. They’re hypocrites.I mentioned Dawkins because he seems to have become the go-to guy for the general public on science. I’m well aware this is outside his field of ‘expertise’, but so is God and he never shuts up on that subject.