I already stated my opposition to what is going on with the Boy Scouts. Read before you type. Maybe it is a comprehension issue, though.
This does not alter that you have shown all that physically attacking a homosexual for no reason is acceptable behavior. My previous evaluation of you stands.
Objecting to the homosexual agenda is one thing. Condoning mindless violence is another. Perhaps you are Al Qaeda. See, it is easy to toss out nonsense in the hope that it sticks.
I have done no such thing; you on the other hand have now lied about me.
Are you a defender of homosexual perversion, in addition to being a liar?
I am quite thoroughly uninterested in your whining about homosexuals being "victims". On a much larger scale, homosexuals are molesters and rapists, and are among those who wish to destroy this formerly decent society. Until we are once again willing and able as a society to condemn homosexual perversion, homosexual molestation, and homosexual rape ... alleged "attacks" on homosexuals for allegedly "no reason" are among the least of our concerns.
More than a bit snippy. No, I have no recollection of specfically reading your comments regarding the BSA.
This does not alter that you have shown all that physically attacking a homosexual for no reason is acceptable behavior. My previous evaluation of you stands. Objecting to the homosexual agenda is one thing. Condoning mindless violence is another. Perhaps you are Al Qaeda. See, it is easy to toss out nonsense in the hope that it sticks.
I knew this "dialogue" had the potential to stray down the path where "fools rush in and angels fear to trod." You cannot find anything in my posts advocating violence towards homosexuals or anyone else for that matter because I don't believe in it. You are way, way off base with that accusation. Next time consider reading something other than Wikipedia before you mount your own digital "jihad".