Yes, a careful read does indicate it isn’t a defense of Chechnya’s action. However, the long winded hand-wringing exercise trying to develop “Why” the Chechens are violent and ‘what happened where when’ goes against my grain, and probably man others. Actually, I don’t give a damn about Chechnya except to say that we should stop taking their ‘refugees’.
Foreign oppression begetting violence exists in every corner of the globe. Somehow, our liberalist State Department and the US Government feels it has to provide refuge for those “poor downtrodden victims of oppression” everywhere. BS. We take in refuges from third world countries who are nothing but terrorists. A hell of a lot of them are Muslims. The rest? There is no valued added to this country by any of them.
What did all this get us? Boston. [and a hell of a drain on the welfare system, to boot]
Historically, Chechens lived off robbing merchants travelling between Russia and Middle East&Indochina via North Caucasus.
Chechen’s most insulting N-word is ‘chaban’ - a shepherd. It brings things into perspective because being a shepherd is probably a single legal occupation possible in their environment.
Hard working is a destiny of infidel slaves following their beliefs, initiative and enterprise are dirty Jewish things.
Chechens also taught to be supremacists since the early age.
All of the above combined makes a nice bunch, isn’t it?