Posted on 04/22/2013 3:16:46 PM PDT by RDangerfield
Something tells me this is not the final word on this subject. There will be another shoe to drop.
Whatever the case may be, this government owes the people of this country a detailed, truthful and immediate explanation of exactly what is going on here, because right now it looks like they are covering for Saudi terrorists.
So, we’re supposed to believe there were TWO Saudis, a terrorist watch list, a student visa, a change of status on someone flagged as an active terrorist, a denial by Janet Napolitano that any Saudi was scheduled for deportation AFTER the status change, etc. etc. Who got to the Examiner?
I thought I heard Beck say that a Congressman had a copy of the file with the 213 3B tag on it. Did I hear that right?
He said several have it. But he specifically named Duncan from South Carolina.
The one that questioned Napalitano.
Beck goes on for days maybe weeks about some really important expose and comes up with nothing.
cumbo78~:”.. Who got to the Examiner? “
Exactly !
a “coincidence “ after Napolitano’s “ not worthy of an answer” to Congressmen ?
R I G H T ...! /sarc
I would further like to know why the First Lady visited him and why she was allowed to visit him by the Secret Service.
I am not sure that this story is over yet.
The two bombers certainly had a lot of money to throw around, considering that their mom was shoplifting, their dad had skipped the country, and the older brother had an ex-wife and child to support. When you add in that both brothers were “college students,” their cars and clothes kind of indicate that they had a lot of money, which had to come from somewhere.
I will give Glenn a while longer to make his case.
BTTT
Plus the fact that this story is being scrubbed from virtually every spot on the Internet tells me there are those who do NOT want this out.
Not exactly ‘nothing’ ... the liar-in-chief’s spin goons are working overtime. Stay tuned ...
Make sure before you believe a Washington Paper.
Anytime Janet the Gut speaks about something I know the opposite is true. Citing DHS for accurate information about ANYTHING is asking for laughter all around. Sorry the Examiner guy is pumping false information but maybe it makes him feel better
So, this author’s evidence that Beck, Breitbart and others are wrong is that “DHS says it was another Saudi national that they refuse to name?”
Any word from Todd Starnes?
Have heard nothing.
I tweeted to him but heard nothing back.
Laughable isn't it?
Okay! Case closed nothing to see here.
The second Saudi is a fictitious creation of DHS.
I think so too. Never heard him even mentioned until recently.
One set of books for the public...another for the admin. No dofferent than any mafia op...or any other fed agency for that matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.