Posted on 04/01/2013 8:53:02 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
You nailed it on that one-
They should just say they are choosing which laws to enforce, just like Obambi chooses not to enforce immigration laws or DOMA or voting rights laws...
BUMP!
Put it in an EO just like he always does. Such a little bratty 3 year old with a bad case of tantrum throwing.
It's different by state. The jurisdication is by County and the Sherrif, in general, has more power out west the in the east.
because they are lawless?
Note to Sheriffs: Don’t respond. Let them come for the answer to each individual Sheriff. Let them chase the answer round, and round as to what you are going to do. Pull a Jerry Brown on them, and tell them I’ll get back to you on that, and of course never do. Tell them what a great day it is today, and how the Sun is shining, and the birds are chirping, or recite the second amendment, or just let them hang.
I trust Mexican drug lords more than I trust the communist in our White House. At least the drug kingpins want America economically strong so they can exploit our children. The drug-addled community organizer wants America weak so that his allies in the Middle East can exploit us.
The Administration's henchmen and village idiots seem to be confounding SHERIFF with MARSHALL and STATE with TERRITORY.
In many instances you'll have state and federal criminal statutes that correspond, and there'll be some agreement ~ usually made as a consequence of law ~ to cooperate so if a local government picks up a criminal for a crime which is also a federal crime, they can hand him over to the federales, and vice versa. Some crimes are easier to deal with locally than others, and vice versa. Prosecutors of the various affected jurisdiction will get together over the bag of heads and see who wants to deal with that one!
http://www.va.gov/about_va/vahistory.asp ~ “The United States has the most comprehensive system of assistance for veterans of any nation in the world. This benefits system traces its roots back to 1636, when the Pilgrims of Plymouth Colony were at war with the Pequot Indians. The Pilgrims passed a law which stated that disabled soldiers would be supported by the colony. “ ~ Just adusting your timeline ~ because gub’mnt involvement in the medical affairs of citizens is pretty ancient.
He is a drug burnt out Muslim.
I suspect that for a little preview of what to expect if a State gets too uppitty, review what Lincoln did to Maryland back in 1861.
Then if they still don’t get the message and hold out for their “rights”, check what General Joe T. Sherman did for Georgia on Lincoln’s behalf.
HIstory tends to repeat itself - especially if it worked for the ruling elite the first time.
“Oath Keepers” have probably, IMHO, been already identified, marked and tagged for future disposition.
Many of them who are on active duty or with significant tactical skills are probably being closely monitored and tracked at all times.
As much as I admire and applaud these Sheriffs who have come out with their defiance of Obama’s tyranny, I suspect that they may have pinned a virtual target on their own backs - as well as their families’ - by doing so.
I for one don’t assume that the assassination of former SEAL Sniper Kyle was any “random act of violence” any more than the “Joker” Zombie’s theater spree, the Giffords / Judge Roll hit or the Newton School Massacre was.
Anyone familiar with MK ULTRA?
There are, I suspect, many more drug addled brain washed weaponized zombies in their arsenal just waiting to launch.
Who will be the next target?
郡治安官 will suffice, as well as bailiff, constable, etc.
A sheriff is second only to the local governing council or official ~ think of him as an officer of the court(s) ~ and for the last 5,000 to 8,000 years we have had courts all over the place.
MK Ultra?
That is tinfoil hat talk....
Shove it deep.
Shove it often.
Ummmmm........
It feels like he is, Bro....
the lawless One demands that the sheriffs uphold the unconstitutional laws he makes? He, himself, picks and chooses which ones he will or will not uphold. I hope these sheriffs remember this when accosted by the DOJ.
Have at it!
Nice try, but the Mayflower company wasn’t a branch of the Federal gubmint :P
The question was that of the state being involved in personal medical problems ~ so there it is. HISTORY does not begin with the United States or even Plymouth Plantation.
Interestingly though, “Sharif” in Arabic, though a similar term, is a false cognate that comes from a completely different etymology.
Nah, the post was about the Federal government and when the Constitution was effectively neutered.
“1965 Medicare–Fed intrusion into health care brought us to where we are today.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.