MARK:
The gospel of Mark was written in a prototype form before it was later crafted into the form that we are familiar with. The earlier version was called ‘Ur Marcus’ and is also known/called ‘Q’ (for ‘Quelle’, which is German for the ‘source’).
Our latest findings regarding the early version of Mark show that this was written at about the time of Claudius Caesar, by the grandfather of Arrius Piso. That version was apparently only a bare sketch and most likely did not give a name to the ‘messiah’. That appears to have been done later by the person who actually played ‘Jesus’ in the Gospels - Arrius Piso
The version that we are familiar with was written about the year 73 CE by Arrius Calpurnius Piso. Arrius Piso was a Roman on his father’s side, but a descendant of King Herod on his mother’s side and therefore he knew well about the Jewish religion. He was also a close relative to the Flavians and even though secretly he could inherit and use the Flavian name by his mother’s descent from them, he gave a story about receiving it from the emperor Vespasian (in his other identity as Flavius Josephus).
MATTHEW:
Matthew too, was authored by Arrius Calpurnius Piso. This was written about the year 75 CE.
LUKE:
Was written 85-90 CE by Arrius C. Piso and Pliny the Younger.
JOHN:
The 4th Gospel, or the Gospel of John was written by Justus Calpurnius Piso, a son of Arrius C. Piso. This son was very much like this father in his hatred towards humanity. This Gospel was written circa 105 CE.
ACTS:
The Acts of the Apostles was written by Arrius Piso and his son Justus, with some help from Pliny the Younger 96-100 CE. By the way, there is a portion of Acts that is missing from most English translations/interpretations. That is the 29th Chapter, which has 10 verses.
ROMANS:
The epistle to the Romans was written by another son of Arrius Piso (Proculus Piso) and Claudia Phoebe about the year 100. Claudia Phoebe is known in history as the wife of the emperor Trajan (as Pompeia Plotina). She wrote the last few verses of this epistle, which many copies of the NT in English leave out because that portion was written by a woman. This is obvious, and she even gives her name as ‘Phoebe’. You can tell where the previous male author leaves off and the female author begins because the male author “signs off” with ‘Amen’. She wrote the last verses (25-27) of Romans, Chapter 16.
1st CORINTHIANS, GALATIONS, and EPHESIANS:
were all written between 100-103 CE by Pliny the Younger.
2nd CORINTHIANS and PHILIPPIANS:
were written by Justus C. Piso between 103-105 CE.
COLOSSIANS:
was written by Justus C. Piso and his son Julianus (Julianus was the father of the emperor Marcus Aurelius, but this is seen in history only by his use of another name ‘Verus’).
1st TIMOTHY:
was written by Pliny the Younger circa 105 CE.
2nd TIMOTHY:
was written by Justus C. Piso (also known in history by other names), c. 107 CE.
1st and 2nd THESSALONIANS:
were written by Justus C. Piso and his son Julianus with some help from his nephew Silanus between the years 105-110 CE.
TITUS:
was written by Pliny the Younger circa 103-105 CE.
PHILEMON:
was written by Justus C. Piso and his son Julianus.
JAMES:
was written by Justus C. Piso around 110 CE.
1st and 2nd PETER:
were written by Proculus Piso between 110-115 CE.
1st, 2nd and 3rd JOHN:
were written by Julius Calpurnius Piso (who was still another son of Arrius Calpurnius Piso), between 110-115 CE.
JUDE:
was written by Julius C. Piso also, between the years 110-115 CE.
THE REVELATION OF JOHN THE DIVINE:
was written by Julius Calpurnius Piso, who may have been the son of the other Julius Calpurnius Piso (who had the same name), and this was written in or about the year 137 CE. It was not the book of the NT, just written as the end of the story.
HEBREWS:
This was written by a grandson of Arrius Piso named Flavius Arrianus circa 140 CE. Flavius Arrianus was the real name of the historian who wrote as ‘Appian’. This person was the half-brother of the emperor Antoninus Pius. Antoninus Pius, by the way, also wrote history under the name of Suetonius. Flavius Arrianus also wrote other works, most notably, he wrote under the name of ‘Ptolemy’.
Wow! That makes the New Testament a veritable “leaning tower” of Piso.
You’ve got to be kidding! Check out the background of your authors - all the Pisos have family connection to Herod. And this is what you are basing your understanding of the Bible on!
Each book of the New Testament identifies its author (except Hebrews). These are the men who wrote the biblical texts. Not friends and family of Herod. A few specific examples of internal evidence come immediately to mind:
In the Gospel of John 20:24 we read, “This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true.” The speaker (who is John) identifies himself as the author of the things being read in this Gospel. Ironically, you said, “...the Gospel of John was written by Justus Calpurnius Piso, a son of Arrius C. Piso. This son was very much like this father in his hatred towards humanity. “ The Gospel of John, which contains the verse, “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son...” you say was written by a hater of humanity.
In Gal 6:11 the writer (identified as Paul in Chapter 1 verse 1 of the book) says, “Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand.” Clearly he is citing evidence as to the authorship of the letter to his readers. He is, in effect, saying, “Check out my handwriting for proof that it is me, Paul, who is writing to you.
In 1 Cor. 16 Paul again testifies to his having written the letter: 1Co 16:21 “The salutation of me Paul with mine own hand.” He is writing to folks that know him...even his handwriting! There is so much internal evidence that supports the authorship/authenticity of scripture that, were any history book required to undergo the same scrutiny, it would fail. That’s because history books, like the ones you seem to enjoy so much, are written by men. God was the ultimate author of scripture and “the GOOD GUY” (forgive me, Lord) knows how to keep accurate accounts.
But more to the point, do you actually think that there would be any followers of Christ if your notion of scriptural authorship were even remotely possible? Do you? Come on, think about it for a moment. Don’t you think if this were true we would be seeing TV news special after TV news special (especially around significant days events - a new Pope, Easter, Christmas) showing the fallacy of the Christian faith!