Posted on 03/19/2013 9:55:12 AM PDT by chessplayer
NYT's Krugman: Skeptics 'punished in the afterlife' --- McKibben: 'White America' has failed
(Excerpt) Read more at climatedepot.com ...
Every race will get their turn...lol
Wait! What???
Liberals don’t believe in God, and therefore no afterlife. So, Krugman must be getting desperate with his attacks.
They did an amazing job on the Obama-like devil figure.
In 15 yrs or so, he’ll be nearly an identical twin.
What “afterlife” you talkin’ about, Krug, you climate warming worshipper?
You plannin’ on collecting us as fossils, as the race evolves into totally global warming worshippers?
I condemn you right back, you looney leftwing putzhead.
Global warming is a business and nothing eles,see Al Gore.
If that doesn’t straighten a person out nothing will.
Many might have to do a stretch in the sulfur pits, but I doubt climate change will be the reason...
Dark Sith Emperor....yup, that sounds about right.
The goal of people (ok, lunatics) like McKibben is for everybody to live in a Unabomber-type shack or some tiny box in a huge building with electricity running every other day. In short, McKibben is kin to the collectivists and Stalinists of the thirties. No surprise here.
I’m a proud and loyal freeper who has concluded the threat from global warming is probably real. I’ve read a great deal from both sides.
HOWEVER...
Carbon dioxide emissions are at a 20-year low, thanks largely to fracking. Fracking was developed with the help of government research. Also a recent study showed a way to extract energy from coal while capturing 99 percent of the emissions. If we want to avoid being hurt by global warming, the most efficient way to do it is research new means of getting and delivering energy.
Say you tell people “you’ll need to eliminate driving, eat only vegetables and live in tiny huts withouth heating or air conditioning. It’s the only hope of humanity surviving past 2100.” Most people would say “screw humanity after 2100.” A better option would be to do research so we have better choices in the first place.
Global Warming on Free Republic
We are about right there in the Florida of Iowa - butt spankin’ cold but without the snow. High tomorrow is forcasted for 32 with low of 18. It isn’t supposed to surpass 60 degrees till after the 1st of April.
Joe Bastardi is saying we should expect the cold and snow till mid April here in the midwest.
That picture is soooooo weird...
I’ve see this pic posted twice and each time I feel like turning up the heat.
On my mountain near the coast in the wet state of Washington, it is presently a balmy 38*..... and wet from rain.
At least you can go ice fishing. ;>)
There are a few of us around. While I am a skeptic of Global Warming Hysteria, I am also a skeptic of the Denialism that reflexively infects the other side.
I believe that, as the example in your post showed, Technology will lead us to a solution, and we should keep moving forward, instead of backwards, as the ecoweenies would have us do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.