Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

My muzzleloading firearms do not use fixed cartridges. By this language these would NOT be considered “firearms”.

At the time of the formulation of the 2nd amendment, muzzleloading flintlocks were considered firearms. I do not think the above definition is properly constrained—it is too tightly constrained.


15 posted on 02/16/2013 9:04:06 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nonsporting

I’m ok with muzzleloaders being exempted from the firearm category.

The first two home invaders get taken out by the .58 ball of double-barrell pistol #1 the next two by pistol #2....


17 posted on 02/16/2013 9:11:56 AM PST by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: nonsporting
My muzzleloading firearms do not use fixed cartridges. By this language these would NOT be considered “firearms”.

Load them, then, and reconsider the definition, heheh.

25 posted on 02/17/2013 12:18:20 PM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson