Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Where is "reasonable" gun control headed?
1 posted on 01/28/2013 12:59:10 PM PST by DanMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DanMiller

Registration violate the 4th amendment. I have the right to be secure in my papers and effects....it’s none of the governments business what I domor do not own.


2 posted on 01/28/2013 1:05:59 PM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DanMiller
Where is "reasonable" gun control headed?

"Gun control" is never reasonable; its only goal, ever, is confiscation of all privately held arms, the complete supremacy of the totalitarian state, and the complete subjugation of the enslaved population.

Diane Feinstein is worse than Stalin, Hitler, Mussonlini, Mao, Pol Pot, and Idi Amin.

They, at least, were honest tyrants.

3 posted on 01/28/2013 1:12:36 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DanMiller
Ignorant people. What difference would it make?
4 posted on 01/28/2013 1:16:16 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DanMiller
"What Purposes Would Federal Background Checks and Firearm Registries Serve?"

They are required for confiscation. Confiscation is required for extermination and mass slavery. We know this from history.

5 posted on 01/28/2013 2:57:16 PM PST by UnwashedPeasant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DanMiller

No person who cannot pass a firearms background check should be permitted to hold any office, appointed or elected. The apparatus of government is far, FAR more dangerous to human life and liberty than any firearm.


6 posted on 01/28/2013 3:00:09 PM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DanMiller

Where was the War on Drugs headed? Are drugs controlled now?


7 posted on 01/28/2013 3:59:15 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DanMiller

This has been my precise question. So this would DELAY the process of gun purchase by whatever time it takes for all local, state, national, etc. (UN? Interpol?) authorities to run your PRINTS. It costs at least $50 for this service through local Sheriff’s office.

Then what do “they” do with what “they” find?

OK. The guy has a petty theft? Disqualified? Or a Domestic Violence charge that was dismissed? Reduced to Disorderly Conduct?. He was convicted of shooting a deer out of season which is a GUN offense? He pee’ed outside a bar which is an Indecent Act or SEX crime. He throws a beer bottle at a stop sign at a tail-gate party so it is an act of VIOLENCE.

WHO decides whether this person is disqualified to buy if not own a gun when he has a Constitutional Right to do so.

How about background check for women wanting an abortion? What? That’s a Constitutional Rights!! (Heloo! 2nd Am.?)

OK. If woman takes Prosac should she be disqualified from having an abortion? If background check turns up a Dad who does NOT want his child killed, does that end the process?

Inquiring minds need to know. The PUBLIC has a Need to Know. Ney, has a RIGHT TO KNOW.


8 posted on 01/28/2013 4:06:33 PM PST by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson