Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A godly Ruler's Inauguration: The Coronation of Edward VI
Theonomy Resources ^ | Jan. 18, 2013

Posted on 01/24/2013 4:41:39 PM PST by GodAndCountryFirst

Edward VI (1537-1553), son of Henry VIII, was crowned king of England and Ireland in 1547 at the tender age of nine. Despite his youthfulness, and the brevity of his reign (he died prematurely in 1553 from an illness), Edward the VI was one of the most godly kings in history. He helped the cause of the Protestant Reformation, and enforced biblical civil law.

Edward VI's coronation took place on February 28, 1547. During the coronation, Archbishop Thomas Cranmer (who would become a martyr during the reign of Bloody Mary) delivered a powerful address—the kind that should be given to all qualified civil rulers. Of Cranmer's charge to Edward, one writer says:

[T]he most remarkable circumstance connected with the coronation, was the address of archbishop Cranmer to the youthful monarch. The prelate therein gave the following charge, which the king did not forget, as his subsequent conduct shows.

(Excerpt) Read more at theonomyresources.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: edwardvi; god; government; inauguration; kingofengland; theonomy
The difference between this and the sad spectacle we had in Washington this week is absolutely stunning. I cannot imagine a president from EITHER PARTY willing to embrace Biblical law. What a sad place we are in!
1 posted on 01/24/2013 4:41:51 PM PST by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

Amen.


2 posted on 01/24/2013 5:00:10 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

Sic semper tyrannus. King is a word that is hateful to the ears of any free man. Read Common Sense.


3 posted on 01/24/2013 5:04:28 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

That may be true. But that was a different era. The point was that he was a leader who was unashamed of upholding the law of God! Our current “leaders” won’t even go there.


4 posted on 01/24/2013 5:10:31 PM PST by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

I don’t need government involved in my religious life. In every era it has not been for the betterment of either!


5 posted on 01/24/2013 5:26:48 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

He was a stooge who fronted for his manipulators. Whether or not you approve of their manipulations depends on your viewpoint.

As Wikipedia briefly sums it up, “During Edward’s reign, the realm was governed by a Regency Council, because he never reached his majority. The Council was first led by his uncle Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset, (1547–1549), and then by John Dudley, 1st Earl of Warwick, from 1551 Duke of Northumberland.”

There’s a pretty good summary of all the cheating and wheeling and dealing under the bio of the Earl of Somerset:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Seymour,_1st_Duke_of_Somerset


6 posted on 01/24/2013 5:27:02 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

This is a Christian nation. The government ought to be upholding the Law of God.


7 posted on 01/24/2013 5:32:00 PM PST by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

They only have the right and power to uphold the Constitution. They need to do that and only that!


8 posted on 01/24/2013 5:36:27 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst; allmendream

LOL, let’s all be ruled over by a 9-year old.


9 posted on 01/24/2013 6:05:13 PM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

The murder of Edward’s successor Charles I was the direct consequence of the Protestantism Edward’s handlers installed in his name.


10 posted on 01/24/2013 6:23:50 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

Cromwell thought he had a mandate to enforce his idea of God’s law. It didn’t work out too well. It seems that Catholic monarchs thought killing Protestants was them enforcing God’s law. And Protestant monarchs thought the same of killing Catholics.

Then we have the son of Henry VIII. What did Jesus say about divorce?


11 posted on 01/24/2013 7:36:24 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
This is a Christian nation. The government ought to be upholding the Law of God.

I disagree. The country was formed based on Judeo-Christian principles, but not truly as a 'Christian' nation, because the Founders wanted this country to be open to people of ALL religions, or even NO religion. Our laws are based on those from Britain, which were based on the Common Law, which were likely based on the Ten Commandments, so at their root, our laws ARE based in religion, but the Founders strove NOT to force any particular religion on anyone.

12 posted on 01/24/2013 7:47:33 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

He would have made a great Catholic ;)


13 posted on 01/24/2013 7:52:24 PM PST by SSDecontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

The United States is built upon a firm foundation of the Biblical world view of the Founding Fathers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fF90CGcsyM

There is NO such thing as “religiously neutral.” Every government reflects a religious point of view. Our government’s values used to be Christian. Now it is the religion of SECULAR HUMANISM that guides us. We need to reclaim America for God and get back to our CHRISTIAN, BIBLICAL roots before it is too late?


14 posted on 01/24/2013 8:41:25 PM PST by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson